This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Arts. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Arts|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few
scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Arts.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
This gallery (no longer in operation) does not meet our notability criteria per
WP:GNG nor
WP:NCORP. The sourcing consists of a press release in StreetArtNews, and a database listing of posters for sale on an art sales website. An online
WP:BEFORE search reveals social media posts, calendar listings, blogs, and a review about an artist who showed there but not about the gallery itself. Nothing substantial that could be considered significant coverage
WP:SIGCOV seems to exist. Bringing it here for the community to decide.
Netherzone (
talk) 17:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Weak deletethis is the best I can find, and it's not enough without more since the focus is on the Sotheby's partnership/show and not in depth about the gallery. StarMississippi 13:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete I am not finding any new sources and the existing sources are not sufficient to show notability.
WomenArtistUpdates (
talk) 21:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
This gallery (no longer in operation) does not meet our notability criteria per
WP:GNG nor
WP:NCORP. The sourcing consists of a press release in StreetArtNews, and a database listing of posters for sale on an art sales website. An online
WP:BEFORE search reveals social media posts, calendar listings, blogs, and a review about an artist who showed there but not about the gallery itself. Nothing substantial that could be considered significant coverage
WP:SIGCOV seems to exist. Bringing it here for the community to decide.
Netherzone (
talk) 17:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Weak deletethis is the best I can find, and it's not enough without more since the focus is on the Sotheby's partnership/show and not in depth about the gallery. StarMississippi 13:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete I am not finding any new sources and the existing sources are not sufficient to show notability.
WomenArtistUpdates (
talk) 21:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Not sourced in a way that proves notability. A quick Google search shows the interviews, etc. already sourcing the article.
I dream of horses(Contribs)(Talk) 04:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete No RS found, most are social media. Inkedmag is about the only "news" coverage found in GNews, and it's just a name drop most times.
Oaktree b (
talk) 04:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete per above, nothing found except inkedmag.
M.Ashraf333 (
talk) 05:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Keep. 1 page of text, plus 4 pages of photos of her work at Skin & Ink Magazine - SUMMER 2021. (n.d.). (n.p.): Skin & Ink Magazine can be found by searching in Google books,
this interview, plus the many mentions in Inked (e.g.
1) and a brief mention in Vanity Fair combined suggest notability to me.
CT55555(
talk) 07:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete I can't find references for the biographical information presented in the article. This article was the 11th edit for Sheitelman and placed into main space, formatted with inbox and categories. The ten previous edits were minor edits to the user page.
WomenArtistUpdates (
talk) 01:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete: I'm not seeing anything in the article that establishes notability. The sources include 2 couple generic "about the author" entries that would exist for just about any book published. The other 3 sources are just passing mentions of the subject.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Keep: There's more information about her in the news, major exhibitions she has participated in and major exhibitions she has curated, most notably
I-You-They: A Century of Artist Women. Not going to agree with any delete given vague rationale that does not address available sources.--
Gazozlu (
talk) 01:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 19:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete. I reviewed every source cited in the article and not a one of them that qualifies as an
WP:Independent,
reliable source discuses the subject of this article in a detailed, descriptive fashion as required by
WP:GNG/
WP:NOTABILITY: almost all of them mention the subject once, maybe twice, and even then only in completely incidental statements mentioning her as the curator for a facility or exhibit that is the actual focus of the statement and source generally. Further, a number of the sources are simply not
WP:RS to begin with. This clearly doesn't come anywhere near the detailed,
significant coverage required under GNG, and (meaning no offense), I'd strongly encourage those !voting Keep above to take a second and more detailed look at the actual content of the sources here. SnowRise let's rap 15:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Delete almost reads like a resume or LinkedIn post, I'm not showing anything substantial, as explained above. Curating an exhibit alone isn't enough for GNG.
Oaktree b (
talk) 00:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
This is a list of examples of wallrings rather than disambiguation of titles. Only
Hamburg Wallring has 'Wallring' in the title;
Braunschweig and
Recklinghausen do not mention a wallring at all. No disambiguation is needed.
Leschnei (
talk) 00:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 00:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Replyreply
Architecture Proposed deletions
Categories
Requested moves
See also
Transcluded pages
The following pages are transcluded here following from relationships among WikiProjects