This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
portal about
Science.
Content dispute discussions should take place on the appropriate article's talk page. For discussions about general portal development, please see the
WikiProject Portals talk page.
Archives:
1If you are a regular maintainer of this portal, please add yourself to this list. |
This portal was identified as a featured portal before the process ended in 2017. | ||||||||||
|
This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Automated portal content suggestions ( ) The following suggestions have been automatically generated as content that might be suitable for the portal, subject to review by a human editor. Please do not mindlessly copy items to the portal page without first checking that the suggestions are appropriate.
|
Is there any list of situations where certain scientific views were marginalized? Like for example Galileo affair. I recently read about the fact that challenging Clovis first theory was "a brutal experience, something that Jacques Cinq-Mars (archeologist) once likened to the Spanish Inquisition." - "Funding for his Bluefish work grew scarce: His fieldwork eventually sputtered and died." [1] - This document talks about scientific dogma - "In retrospect, it seems to me that Clovis-First graduated from a theory to received wisdom and ultimately to a dogma too ardently defended" ( After Clovis-First collapsed: reimagining the peopling of the Americas - January 2014 - Project: Maritime Dispersals in Deep Human History - Authors: Jon Erlandson - University of Oregon)
I mean instances when challenging the scientific consensus or the scientific views of authorities was very difficult or impossible. [2]
Another instances is this: "During the eighteenth century the French Academy of Sciences stubbornly denied the evidence for the fall of meteorites" and ""Scientists in other countries were anxious not to be considered as backward compared with their famous colleagues in Paris", writes F. Paneth ("Science and Miracles", Durham University Journal, vol. 10 (1948-9), p. 49). "... many public museums threw away whatever they possessed of these precious meteorites; it happened in Germany, Denmark, Switzerland, Italy and Austria." [3] - this is another example of consensus of the scientific community putting a huge pressure on those who support a new valid idea. -- Barecode ( talk) 00:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I found that at the bottom of the Science Portal Page, there are numerous red letter errors displaying "The time allocated for running scripts has expired," especially under the last little black words of "Portal," there's a bunch of "The time allocated for running scripts has expired."
"Portals
The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired. The time allocated for running scripts has expired."
This is exactly what it says Can someone please fix this? My knowledge on coding and technology limits my ability to recover such glitch -- TheeChEese ( talk) 21:45, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Update: Never mind, after a couple of page refreshes, the error has vanished. TheeChEese ( talk) 22:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
The six simple machine — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.57.95.80 ( talk) 16:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
V 2409:4042:2812:65C5:0:0:A59:18AC ( talk) 14:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The Chemistry of life. 41.114.252.196 ( talk) 20:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)