A passerine (/ˈpæsəraɪn/) is any
bird of the
orderPasseriformes (/ˈpæsərɪfɔːrmiːz/; from
Latinpasser 'sparrow' and formis '-shaped') which includes more than half of all bird species. Sometimes known as perching birds, passerines generally have an
anisodactyl arrangement of their toes (three pointing forward and one back), which facilitates perching.
With more than 140 families and some 6,500 identified species,[1] Passeriformes is the largest order of birds and among the most diverse
clades of terrestrial
vertebrates, representing 60% of birds.[2][3] Passerines are divided into three
suborders:
Acanthisitti (New Zealand wrens),
Tyranni (composed mostly of
South American suboscines), and
Passeri (oscines or songbirds).[4][5] Passerines originated in the
Southern Hemisphere around 60 million years ago.[6]
The terms "passerine" and "Passeriformes" are derived from the
scientific name of the
house sparrow, Passer domesticus, and ultimately from the
Latin term passer, which refers to sparrows and similar small birds.
Description
The order is divided into three suborders,
Tyranni (suboscines),
Passeri (oscines or songbirds), and the
basalAcanthisitti.[7] Oscines have the best control of their
syrinx muscles among birds, producing a wide range of
songs and other vocalizations, though some of them, such as the
crows, do not sound musical to human beings. Some, such as the
lyrebird, are accomplished mimics.[8] The
New Zealand wrens are tiny birds restricted to
New Zealand, at least in modern times; they were long placed in Passeri.
Most passerines are smaller than typical members of other avian orders. The heaviest and altogether largest passerines are the
thick-billed raven[9] and the larger races of
common raven, each exceeding 1.5 kg (3.3 lb) and 70 cm (28 in). The
superb lyrebird and some
birds-of-paradise, due to very long tails or tail coverts, are longer overall. The smallest passerine is the
short-tailed pygmy tyrant, at 6.5 cm (2.6 in) and 4.2 g (0.15 oz).[10]
Anatomy
The foot of a passerine has three toes directed forward and one toe directed backward, called
anisodactyl arrangement. The hind toe (
hallux) is long and joins the leg at approximately the same level as the front toes. This arrangement enables passerine birds to easily perch upright on branches. The toes have no webbing or joining, but in some
cotingas, the second and third toes are united at their basal third.
The leg of passerine birds contains an additional special adaptation for perching. A tendon in the rear of the leg running from the underside of the toes to the muscle behind the
tibiotarsus will automatically be pulled and tighten when the leg bends, causing the foot to curl and become stiff when the bird lands on a branch. This enables passerines to sleep while perching without falling off.[11][12]
Most passerine birds have 12 tail feathers but the
superb lyrebird has 16,[13] and several spinetails in the family
Furnariidae have 10, 8, or even 6, as is the case of
Des Murs's wiretail. Species adapted to tree trunk climbing such as
treecreepers and
woodcreeper have stiff tail feathers that are used as props during climbing.[14] Extremely long tails used as sexual ornaments are shown by species in different families. A well-known example is the
long-tailed widowbird.
The chicks of passerines are
altricial: blind, featherless, and helpless when hatched from their eggs. Hence, the chicks require extensive parental care. Most passerines lay colored eggs, in contrast with nonpasserines, most of whose eggs are white except in some ground-nesting groups such as
Charadriiformes and
nightjars, where camouflage is necessary, and in some
parasiticcuckoos, which match the passerine host's egg. The
vinous-throated parrotbill has two egg colors, white and blue, to deter the brood parasitic
common cuckoo.[citation needed]
Clutches vary considerably in size: some larger passerines of Australia such as lyrebirds and scrub-robins lay only a single egg, most smaller passerines in warmer climates lay between two and five, while in the higher latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, hole-nesting species like
tits can lay up to a dozen and other species around five or six.
The family
Viduidae do not build their own nests, instead, they lay eggs in other birds' nests.[citation needed]
The evolutionary history of the passerine families and the relationships among them remained rather mysterious until the late 20th century. In many cases, passerine families were grouped together on the basis of morphological similarities that, it is now believed, are the result of
convergent evolution, not a close genetic relationship. For example, the
wrens of the Americas and Eurasia,
those of Australia, and
those of New Zealand look superficially similar and behave in similar ways, yet belong to three far-flung branches of the passerine family tree; they are as unrelated as it is possible to be while remaining Passeriformes.[a]
Advances in
molecular biology and improved
paleobiogeographical data gradually are revealing a clearer picture of passerine origins and evolution that reconciles molecular affinities, the constraints of morphology, and the specifics of the fossil record.[16] The first passerines are now thought to have evolved in the
Southern Hemisphere in the late
Paleocene or early
Eocene, around 50 million years ago.[5][6]
The initial diversification of passerines coincides with the separation of the southern continents in the
early Eocene. The
New Zealand wrens are the first to become isolated in
Zealandia, and the second split involved the origin of the
Tyranni in
South America and the
Passeri in the
Australian continent.[2][6][3] The Passeri experienced a great radiation of forms in Australia. A major branch of the Passeri, the
parvorderPasserida, dispersed into Eurasia and Africa about 40 million years ago, where they experienced further radiation of new lineages.[6] This eventually led to three major
Passerida lineages comprising about 4,000 species, which in addition to the
Corvida and numerous minor lineages make up songbird diversity today. Extensive
biogeographical mixing happens, with northern forms returning to the south, southern forms moving north, and so on.[3]
Fossil record
Earliest passerines
Perching bird
osteology, especially of the limb bones, is rather diagnostic.[17][18][19] However, the early fossil record is poor because passerines are relatively small, and their delicate bones do not preserve well.
Queensland Museum specimens F20688 (
carpometacarpus) and F24685 (
tibiotarsus) from
Murgon, Queensland, are fossil bone fragments initially assigned to
Passeriformes.[17] However, the material is too fragmentary and their affinities have been questioned.[20] Several more recent fossils from the
Oligocene of Europe, such as Wieslochia, Jamna, Resoviaornis, and Crosnoornis,[21] are more complete and definitely represent early passeriforms, and have been found to belong to a variety of modern and extinct lineages.[22]
That suboscines expanded much beyond their region of origin is proven by several fossils from Germany such as a presumed broadbill (
Eurylaimidae) humerus fragment from the Early
Miocene (roughly 20 mya) of
Wintershof, Germany, the Late Oligocene
carpometacarpus from France listed above, and Wieslochia, among others.[18][6] Extant Passeri super-families were quite distinct by that time and are known since about 12–13 mya when modern genera were present in the corvoidean and basal songbirds. The modern diversity of Passerida genera is known mostly from the Late Miocene onward and into the
Pliocene (about 10–2 mya).
Pleistocene and early
Holocenelagerstätten (<1.8 mya) yield numerous extant species, and many yield almost nothing but extant species or their
chronospecies and paleosubspecies.
In the
Americas, the fossil record is more scant before the Pleistocene, from which several still-existing families are documented. Apart from the indeterminable
MACN-SC-1411 (Pinturas Early/Middle Miocene of Santa Cruz Province, Argentina),[f] an extinct lineage of perching birds has been described from the Late Miocene of California, United States: the
Palaeoscinidae with the single genus Palaeoscinis. "Palaeostruthus" eurius (Pliocene of Florida) probably belongs to an extant family, most likely
passeroidean.
Systematics and taxonomy
Acanthisitti – New Zealand wrens (1 family containing 7 species, only 2 extant)
Phylogenetic relationship of the suborders within the Passeriformes. The numbers are from the list published by the
International Ornithologists' Union in January 2020.[1][31]
The Passeriformes is currently divided into three suborders:
Acanthisitti (New Zealand wrens),
Tyranni, (suboscines) and
Passeri (oscines or songbirds). The Passeri is now subdivided into two major groups recognized now as
Corvides and
Passerida respectively containing the large
superfamiliesCorvoidea and
Meliphagoidea, as well as minor lineages, and the superfamilies
Sylvioidea,
Muscicapoidea, and
Passeroidea but this arrangement has been found to be oversimplified. Since the mid-2000s, studies have investigated the
phylogeny of the Passeriformes and found that many families from
Australasia traditionally included in the Corvoidea actually represent more basal lineages within oscines. Likewise, the traditional three-superfamily arrangement within the Passeri has turned out to be far more complex and will require changes in classification.[citation needed]
Major "
wastebin" families such as the
Old World warblers and
Old World babblers have turned out to be
paraphyletic and are being rearranged. Several taxa turned out to represent highly distinct lineages, so new families had to be established, some of theirs – like the
stitchbird of New Zealand and the
Eurasianbearded reedling –
monotypic with only one living species.[32] In the Passeri alone, a number of minor lineages will eventually be recognized as distinct superfamilies. For example, the
kinglets constitute a single genus with less than 10 species today but seem to have been among the first perching bird lineages to diverge as the group spread across Eurasia. No particularly close relatives of theirs have been found among comprehensive studies of the living Passeri, though they might be fairly close to some little-studied tropical Asian groups.
Nuthatches,
wrens, and their closest relatives are currently grouped in a distinct super-family
Certhioidea.
Taxonomic list of Passeriformes families
This list is in taxonomic order, placing related families next to one another. The families listed are those recognised by the
International Ornithologists' Union (IOC).[1] The order and the division into infraorders, parvorders, and superfamilies follows the phylogenetic analysis published by Carl Oliveros and colleagues in 2019.[31][g] The relationships between the families in the suborder Tyranni (suboscines) were all well determined but some of the nodes in Passeri (oscines or songbirds) were unclear owing to the rapid splitting of the lineages.[31]
Relationships between living Passeriformes families based on the phylogenetic analysis of Oliveros et al (2019).[31] Some terminals have been renamed to reflect families recognised by the IOC but not in that study.[1] The IOC families
Alcippeidae and
Teretistridae were not sampled in this study.
^The name
wren has been applied to other, unrelated birds in Australia and New Zealand. The 27
Australasian "wren" species in the family
Maluridae are unrelated, as are the
New Zealand wrens in the family Acanthisittidae; the antwrens in the family
Thamnophilidae; and the wren-babblers of the families
Timaliidae,
Pellorneidae, and
Pnoepygidae. For the monophyly of the "true wrens", Troglodytidae, see Barker 2004.[15]
^Specimen
SMF Av 504. A flattened right hand of a passerine perhaps 10 cm long overall. If suboscine, perhaps closer to
Cotingidae than to
Eurylaimides.[24][19]
^Specimens
SMF Av 487–496;
SMNS 86822, 86825-86826;
MNHN SA 1259–1263:
tibiotarsus remains of small, possibly basal Passeriformes.[18]
^Oliveros et al (2019) use the list of families published by Dickinson and Christidis in 2014.[31][33] Oliveros et al include 8 families that are not included on the IOC list. These are not shown here. By contrast, the IOC list includes 15 families that are not present in Dickinson and Christidis. In 13 of these cases, the position of the additional family in the taxonomic order can be determined from the species included by Oliveros and colleagues in their analysis. No species in the families
Alcippeidae and
Teretistridae were sampled by Oliveros et al so their position is uncertain.[1][31]
^The order of the families within the superfamily Orioloidea is uncertain.[31]
^The order of the families within the superfamily Malaconotoidea is uncertain.[31]
^The order of the families within the superfamily Corvoidea is uncertain.[31]
^The taxonomic sequence of the superfamilies Locustelloidea, Sylvioidea and Aegithaloidea is uncertain, although the order of the families within each of the superfamilies is well determined.[31]
^The order of some of the families within the superfamily Emberizoidea is uncertain.[31]
^The family
Teretistridae (Cuban warblers) is tentatively placed here. The family was not included in the analysis published by Oliveros et al (2019).[31] Dickinson and Christidis (2014) considered the genus TeretistrisIncertae sedis.[36] Barker et al (2013) found that Teretistridae is closely related to
Zeledoniidae.[35]
^Chatterjee, Sankar (2015). The Rise of Birds: 225 Million Years of Evolution. JHU Press. pp. 206–207.
ISBN9781421415901.
^Winkler, D. W., S. M. Billerman, and I.J. Lovette (2020). Lyrebirds (Menuridae), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (S. M. Billerman, B. K. Keeney, P. G. Rodewald, and T. S. Schulenberg, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, US.
https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.menuri1.01
^Madge, S. (2020). Thick-billed Raven (Corvus crassirostris), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, and E. de Juana, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, US.
https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.thbrav1.01
^Clock, B. (2020). Short-tailed Pygmy-Tyrant (Myiornis ecaudatus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, and E. de Juana, Editors). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, US.
https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.stptyr1.01
^Stefoff, Rebecca (2008). The Bird Class. Marshall Cavendish Benchmark.
ISBN9780761426936.
^Brooke, Michael and Birkhead, Tim (1991) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Ornithology, Cambridge University Press
ISBN0521362059.
^Jones, D. (2008) "Flight of fancy". Australian Geographic, (89), 18–19.
^Barker, F.K. (2004). "Monophyly and relationships of wrens (Aves: Troglodytidae): a congruence analysis of heterogeneous mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence data". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 31 (2): 486–504.
Bibcode:
2004MolPE..31..486B.
doi:
10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.005.
PMID15062790.
^Hugueney, Marguerite; Berthet, Didier; Bodergat, Anne-Marie; Escuillié, François; Mourer-Chauviré, Cécile & Wattinne, Aurélia (2003). "La limite Oligocène-Miocène en Limagne: changements fauniques chez les mammifères, oiseaux et ostracodes des différents niveaux de Billy-Créchy (Allier, France)" [The Oligocene-Miocene boundary in Limagne: faunal changes in the mammals, birds and ostracods from the different levels of Billy-Créchy (Allier, France)]. Geobios. 36 (6): 719–731.
Bibcode:
2003Geobi..36..719H.
doi:
10.1016/j.geobios.2003.01.002.
^Gál, Erika; Hír, János; Kessler, Eugén & Kókay, József (1998–99). "Középsõ-miocén õsmaradványok, a Mátraszõlõs, Rákóczi-kápolna alatti útbevágásból. I. A Mátraszõlõs 1. lelõhely" [Middle Miocene fossils from the sections at the Rákóczi chapel at Mátraszőlős. Locality Mátraszõlõs I.]. Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis. 23: 33–78.
^
Gál, Erika; Hír, János; Kessler, Eugén; Kókay, József & Márton, Venczel (2000). "Középsõ-miocén õsmaradványok a Mátraszõlõs, Rákóczi-kápolna alatti útbevágásból II. A Mátraszõlõs 2. lelõhely" [Middle Miocene fossils from the section of the road at the Rákóczi Chapel, Mátraszõlõs. II. Locality Mátraszõlõs 2]. Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis. 24: 39–75.
^
abHír, János; Kókay, József; Venczel, Márton; Gál, Erika & GKessler, Eugén (2001).
"Elõzetes beszámoló a felsõtárkányi "Güdör-kert" n. õslénytani lelõhelykomplex újravizsgálatáról" [A preliminary report on the revised investigation of the paleontological locality-complex "Güdör-kert" at Felsõtárkány, Northern Hungary] (PDF). Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis. 25: 41–64.
Archived(PDF) from the original on 16 March 2021.
^The former does not even have recognized subspecies, while the latter is one of the most singular birds alive today. Good photos of a bearded reedling are for example
hereArchived 16 October 2007 at the
Wayback Machine and
hereArchived 31 July 2008 at the
Wayback Machine.
^
abcdeCracraft, Joel (2014). "Avian higher-level relationships and classification: passeriformes". In
Dickinson, E.C.;
Christidis, L. (eds.). The Howard & Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 2: Passerines (4th ed.). Eastbourne, UK: Aves Press. pp. xvii-xxxiii [xxiv].
ISBN978-0-9568611-2-2.
Mayr, Gerald (2016). Avian evolution: the fossil record of birds and its paleobiological significance. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
ISBN978-1-119-02076-9.