Partition (number theory) Information
In number theory and combinatorics, a partition of a positive integer n, also called an integer partition, is a way of writing n as a sum of positive integers. Two sums that differ only in the order of their summands are considered the same partition. (If order matters, the sum becomes a composition.) For example, 4 can be partitioned in five distinct ways:
 4
 3 + 1
 2 + 2
 2 + 1 + 1
 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
The orderdependent composition 1 + 3 is the same partition as 3 + 1, and the two distinct compositions 1 + 2 + 1 and 1 + 1 + 2 represent the same partition as 2 + 1 + 1.
A summand in a partition is also called a part. The number of partitions of n is given by the partition function p(n). So p(4) = 5. The notation λ ⊢ n means that λ is a partition of n.
Partitions can be graphically visualized with Young diagrams or Ferrers diagrams. They occur in a number of branches of mathematics and physics, including the study of symmetric polynomials and of the symmetric group and in group representation theory in general.
Examples
The seven partitions of 5 are:
 5
 4 + 1
 3 + 2
 3 + 1 + 1
 2 + 2 + 1
 2 + 1 + 1 + 1
 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
Some authors treat partitions as the sequence of summands, rather than as an expression with plus signs. For example, the partition 2 + 2 + 1 might instead be written as the tuple (2, 2, 1) or in the even more compact form (2^{2}, 1) where the superscript indicates the number of repetitions of a part.
Representations of partitions
There are two common diagrammatic methods to represent partitions: as Ferrers diagrams, named after Norman Macleod Ferrers, and as Young diagrams, named after Alfred Young. Both have several possible conventions; here, we use English notation, with diagrams aligned in the upperleft corner.
Ferrers diagram
The partition 6 + 4 + 3 + 1 of the number 14 can be represented by the following diagram:
The 14 circles are lined up in 4 rows, each having the size of a part of the partition. The diagrams for the 5 partitions of the number 4 are shown below:



 
4  =  3 + 1  =  2 + 2  =  2 + 1 + 1  =  1 + 1 + 1 + 1 
Young diagram
An alternative visual representation of an integer partition is its Young diagram (often also called a Ferrers diagram). Rather than representing a partition with dots, as in the Ferrers diagram, the Young diagram uses boxes or squares. Thus, the Young diagram for the partition 5 + 4 + 1 is
while the Ferrers diagram for the same partition is
While this seemingly trivial variation does not appear worthy of separate mention, Young diagrams turn out to be extremely useful in the study of symmetric functions and group representation theory: filling the boxes of Young diagrams with numbers (or sometimes more complicated objects) obeying various rules leads to a family of objects called Young tableaux, and these tableaux have combinatorial and representationtheoretic significance.^{ [1]} As a type of shape made by adjacent squares joined together, Young diagrams are a special kind of polyomino.^{ [2]}
Partition function
The partition function equals the number of possible partitions of a nonnegative integer . For instance, because the integer has the five partitions , , , , and . The values of this function for are:
 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 15, 22, 30, 42, 56, 77, 101, 135, 176, 231, 297, 385, 490, 627, 792, 1002, 1255, 1575, 1958, 2436, 3010, 3718, 4565, 5604, ... (sequence A000041 in the OEIS).
The generating function of is
No closedform expression for the partition function is known, but it has both asymptotic expansions that accurately approximate it and recurrence relations by which it can be calculated exactly. It grows as an exponential function of the square root of its argument.^{ [3]} The multiplicative inverse of its generating function is the Euler function; by Euler's pentagonal number theorem this function is an alternating sum of pentagonal number powers of its argument.
Srinivasa Ramanujan discovered that the partition function has nontrivial patterns in modular arithmetic, now known as Ramanujan's congruences. For instance, whenever the decimal representation of ends in the digit 4 or 9, the number of partitions of will be divisible by 5.^{ [4]}
Restricted partitions
In both combinatorics and number theory, families of partitions subject to various restrictions are often studied.^{ [5]} This section surveys a few such restrictions.
Conjugate and selfconjugate partitions
If we flip the diagram of the partition 6 + 4 + 3 + 1 along its main diagonal, we obtain another partition of 14:

↔ 

6 + 4 + 3 + 1  =  4 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 
By turning the rows into columns, we obtain the partition 4 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 of the number 14. Such partitions are said to be conjugate of one another.^{ [6]} In the case of the number 4, partitions 4 and 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 are conjugate pairs, and partitions 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 + 1 are conjugate of each other. Of particular interest is the partition 2 + 2, which has itself as conjugate. Such a partition is said to be selfconjugate.^{ [7]}
Claim: The number of selfconjugate partitions is the same as the number of partitions with distinct odd parts.
Proof (outline): The crucial observation is that every odd part can be "folded" in the middle to form a selfconjugate diagram:
↔ 

One can then obtain a bijection between the set of partitions with distinct odd parts and the set of selfconjugate partitions, as illustrated by the following example:
↔ 
 
9 + 7 + 3  =  5 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 
Dist. odd  selfconjugate 
Odd parts and distinct parts
Among the 22 partitions of the number 8, there are 6 that contain only odd parts:
 7 + 1
 5 + 3
 5 + 1 + 1 + 1
 3 + 3 + 1 + 1
 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1
Alternatively, we could count partitions in which no number occurs more than once. Such a partition is called a partition with distinct parts. If we count the partitions of 8 with distinct parts, we also obtain 6:
 8
 7 + 1
 6 + 2
 5 + 3
 5 + 2 + 1
 4 + 3 + 1
This is a general property. For each positive number, the number of partitions with odd parts equals the number of partitions with distinct parts, denoted by q(n).^{ [8]}^{ [9]} This result was proved by Leonhard Euler in 1748^{ [10]} and later was generalized as Glaisher's theorem.
For every type of restricted partition there is a corresponding function for the number of partitions satisfying the given restriction. An important example is q(n) (partitions into distinct parts). The first few values of q(n) are (starting with q(0)=1):
The generating function for q(n) is given by^{ [11]}
The pentagonal number theorem gives a recurrence for q:^{ [12]}
 q(k) = a_{k} + q(k − 1) + q(k − 2) − q(k − 5) − q(k − 7) + q(k − 12) + q(k − 15) − q(k − 22) − ...
where a_{k} is (−1)^{m} if k = 3m^{2} − m for some integer m and is 0 otherwise.
Restricted part size or number of parts
By taking conjugates, the number p_{k}(n) of partitions of n into exactly k parts is equal to the number of partitions of n in which the largest part has size k. The function p_{k}(n) satisfies the recurrence
 p_{k}(n) = p_{k}(n − k) + p_{k−1}(n − 1)
with initial values p_{0}(0) = 1 and p_{k}(n) = 0 if n ≤ 0 or k ≤ 0 and n and k are not both zero.^{ [13]}
One recovers the function p(n) by
One possible generating function for such partitions, taking k fixed and n variable, is
More generally, if T is a set of positive integers then the number of partitions of n, all of whose parts belong to T, has generating function
This can be used to solve changemaking problems (where the set T specifies the available coins). As two particular cases, one has that the number of partitions of n in which all parts are 1 or 2 (or, equivalently, the number of partitions of n into 1 or 2 parts) is
and the number of partitions of n in which all parts are 1, 2 or 3 (or, equivalently, the number of partitions of n into at most three parts) is the nearest integer to (n + 3)^{2} / 12.^{ [14]}
Asymptotics
The asymptotic growth rate for p(n) is given by
where .^{ [15]}
The more precise asymptotic formula
 as
was first obtained by G. H. Hardy and Ramanujan in 1918 and independently by J. V. Uspensky in 1920. A complete asymptotic expansion was given in 1937 by Hans Rademacher.
If A is a set of natural numbers, we let p_{A}(n) denote the number of partitions of n into elements of A. If A possesses positive natural density α then
and conversely if this asymptotic property holds for p_{A}(n) then A has natural density α.^{ [16]} This result was stated, with a sketch of proof, by Erdős in 1942.^{ [17]}^{ [18]}
If A is a finite set, this analysis does not apply (the density of a finite set is zero). If A has k elements whose greatest common divisor is 1, then^{ [19]}
Partitions in a rectangle and Gaussian binomial coefficients
One may also simultaneously limit the number and size of the parts. Let p(N,M;n) denote the number of partitions of n with at most M parts, each of size at most N. Equivalently, these are the partitions whose Young diagram fits inside an M × N rectangle. There is a recurrence relation
obtained by observing that counts the partitions of n into exactly M parts of size at most N, and subtracting 1 from each part of such a partition yields a partition of n − M into at most M parts.^{ [20]}
The Gaussian binomial coefficient is defined as:
Rank and Durfee square
The rank of a partition is the largest number k such that the partition contains at least k parts of size at least k. For example, the partition 4 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 has rank 3 because it contains 3 parts that are ≥ 3, but does not contain 4 parts that are ≥ 4. In the Ferrers diagram or Young diagram of a partition of rank r, the r × r square of entries in the upperleft is known as the Durfee square:
The Durfee square has applications within combinatorics in the proofs of various partition identities.^{ [21]} It also has some practical significance in the form of the hindex.
A different statistic is also sometimes called the rank of a partition (or Dyson rank), namely, the difference for a partition of k parts with largest part . This statistic (which is unrelated to the one described above) appears in the study of Ramanujan congruences.
Young's lattice
There is a natural partial order on partitions given by inclusion of Young diagrams. This partially ordered set is known as Young's lattice. The lattice was originally defined in the context of representation theory, where it is used to describe the irreducible representations of symmetric groups S_{n} for all n, together with their branching properties, in characteristic zero. It also has received significant study for its purely combinatorial properties; notably, it is the motivating example of a differential poset.
See also
 Rank of a partition, a different notion of rank
 Crank of a partition
 Dominance order
 Factorization
 Integer factorization
 Partition of a set
 Stars and bars (combinatorics)
 Plane partition
 Polite number, defined by partitions into consecutive integers
 Multiplicative partition
 Twelvefold way
 Ewens's sampling formula
 Faà di Bruno's formula
 Multipartition
 Newton's identities
 Smallestparts function
 A Goldbach partition is the partition of an even number into primes (see Goldbach's conjecture)
 Kostant's partition function
Notes
 ^ Andrews 1976, p. 199.
 ^ JosuatVergès, Matthieu (2010), "Bijections between patternavoiding fillings of Young diagrams", Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 117 (8): 1218–1230, arXiv: 0801.4928, doi: 10.1016/j.jcta.2010.03.006, MR 2677686, S2CID 15392503.
 ^ Andrews 1976, p. 69.
 ^ Hardy & Wright 2008, p. 380.
 ^ Alder, Henry L. (1969). "Partition identities  from Euler to the present". American Mathematical Monthly. 76 (7): 733–746. doi: 10.2307/2317861. JSTOR 2317861.
 ^ Hardy & Wright 2008, p. 362.
 ^ Hardy & Wright 2008, p. 368.
 ^ Hardy & Wright 2008, p. 365.
 ^ Notation follows Abramowitz & Stegun 1964, p. 825
 ^ Andrews, George E. (1971). Number Theory. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company. pp. 149–50.
 ^ Abramowitz & Stegun 1964, p. 825, 24.2.2 eq. I(B)
 ^ Abramowitz & Stegun 1964, p. 826, 24.2.2 eq. II(A)
 ^ Richard Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, volume 1, second edition. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Chapter 1, section 1.7.
 ^ Hardy, G.H. (1920). Some Famous Problems of the Theory of Numbers. Clarendon Press.
 ^ Andrews 1976, pp. 70, 97.
 ^ Nathanson 2000, pp. 475–85.
 ^ Erdős, Pál (1942). "On an elementary proof of some asymptotic formulas in the theory of partitions". Ann. Math. (2). 43 (3): 437–450. doi: 10.2307/1968802. JSTOR 1968802. Zbl 0061.07905.
 ^ Nathanson 2000, p. 495.
 ^ Nathanson 2000, pp. 458–64.
 ^ Andrews 1976, pp. 33–34.
 ^ see, e.g., Stanley 1999, p. 58
References
 Abramowitz, Milton; Stegun, Irene (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. United States Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards. ISBN 0486612724.
 Andrews, George E. (1976). The Theory of Partitions. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 052163766X.
 Andrews, George E.; Eriksson, Kimmo (2004). Integer Partitions. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521600901.
 Apostol, Tom M. (1990) [1976]. Modular functions and Dirichlet series in number theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 41 (2nd ed.). New York etc.: SpringerVerlag. ISBN 0387971270. Zbl 0697.10023. (See chapter 5 for a modern pedagogical intro to Rademacher's formula).
 Bóna, Miklós (2002). A Walk Through Combinatorics: An Introduction to Enumeration and Graph Theory. World Scientific Publishing. ISBN 9810249004. (an elementary introduction to the topic of integer partitions, including a discussion of Ferrers graphs)
 Hardy, G. H.; Wright, E. M. (2008) [1938]. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Revised by D. R. HeathBrown and J. H. Silverman. Foreword by Andrew Wiles. (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199219865. MR 2445243. Zbl 1159.11001.
 Lehmer, D. H. (1939). "On the remainder and convergence of the series for the partition function". Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 46: 362–373. doi: 10.1090/S00029947193900004109. MR 0000410. Zbl 0022.20401. Provides the main formula (no derivatives), remainder, and older form for A_{k}(n).)
 Gupta, Hansraj; Gwyther, C.E.; Miller, J.C.P. (1962). Royal Society of Math. Tables. Vol. 4, Tables of partitions. (Has text, nearly complete bibliography, but they (and Abramowitz) missed the Selberg formula for A_{k}(n), which is in Whiteman.)
 Macdonald, Ian G. (1979). Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198535309. Zbl 0487.20007. (See section I.1)
 Nathanson, M.B. (2000). Elementary Methods in Number Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 195. SpringerVerlag. ISBN 0387989129. Zbl 0953.11002.
 Rademacher, Hans (1974). Collected Papers of Hans Rademacher. Vol. v II. MIT Press. pp. 100–07, 108–22, 460–75.
 Sautoy, Marcus Du. (2003). The Music of the Primes. New York: PerennialHarperCollins. ISBN 9780066210704.
 Stanley, Richard P. (1999). Enumerative Combinatorics. Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521560691.
 Whiteman, A. L. (1956). "A sum connected with the series for the partition function". Pacific Journal of Mathematics. 6 (1): 159–176. doi: 10.2140/pjm.1956.6.159. Zbl 0071.04004. (Provides the Selberg formula. The older form is the finite Fourier expansion of Selberg.)
External links
 "Partition", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
 Partition and composition calculator
 Weisstein, Eric W. "Partition". MathWorld.
 Wilf, Herbert S. Lectures on Integer Partitions (PDF), archived (PDF) from the original on 20210224, retrieved 20210228
 Counting with partitions with reference tables to the OnLine Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences
 Integer partitions entry in the FindStat database
 Integer::Partition Perl module from CPAN
 Fast Algorithms For Generating Integer Partitions
 Generating All Partitions: A Comparison Of Two Encodings
 Grime, James (April 28, 2016). "Partitions  Numberphile" (video). Brady Haran. Archived from the original on 20211211. Retrieved 5 May 2016.