The word 'Eukaryote' is derived from the
Greek words "eu" (εὖ) meaning "true" or "good" and "karyon" (κάρυον) meaning "nut" or "kernel," referring to the
nucleus of a
cell.[6]
Eukaryotes are
organisms that range from microscopic single
cells, such as
picozoans under 3 micrometres across,[7] to
animals like the
blue whale, weighing up to 190
tonnes and measuring up to 33.6 metres (110 ft) long,[8] or
plants like the
coast redwood, up to 120 metres (390 ft) tall.[9] Many eukaryotes are unicellular; the informal grouping called
protists includes many of these, with some multicellular forms like the
giant kelp up to 200 feet (61 m) long.[10] The multicellular eukaryotes include the animals, plants, and
fungi, but again, these groups too contain many unicellular
species.[11] Eukaryotic cells are typically much larger than those of
prokaryotes—the
bacteria and the
archaea—having a volume of around 10,000 times greater.[12][13] Eukaryotes represent a small minority of the number of
organisms, but, as many of them are much larger, their collective global
biomass (468 gigatons) is far larger than that of prokaryotes (77 gigatons), with plants alone accounting for over 81% of the total biomass of
Earth.[14]
Eukaryotes range in size from single-celled organisms to huge whales
The defining feature of eukaryotes is that
their cells have a well-defined, membrane-bound
nuclei, distinguishing them from
prokaryotes that lack such a structure. Eukaryotic cells have a variety of internal membrane-bound structures, called
organelles, and a
cytoskeleton which defines the cell's organization and shape. The nucleus stores the cell's
DNA, which is divided into linear bundles called
chromosomes;[19] these are separated into two matching sets by a
microtubular spindle during nuclear division, in the distinctively eukaryotic process of
mitosis.[20]
Biochemistry
Eukaryotes differ from prokaryotes in multiple ways, with unique biochemical pathways such as
sterane synthesis.[21] The eukaryotic signature
proteins have no homology to proteins in other domains of life, but appear to be universal among eukaryotes. They include the proteins of the cytoskeleton, the complex
transcription machinery, the membrane-sorting systems, the
nuclear pore, and some
enzymes in the biochemical pathways.[22]
Eukaryotic cells are some 10,000 times larger than prokaryotic cells by volume, and contain
membrane-bound organelles.
Eukaryote cells include a variety of membrane-bound structures, together forming the endomembrane system.[23] Simple compartments, called
vesicles and
vacuoles, can form by budding off other membranes. Many cells ingest food and other materials through a process of
endocytosis, where the outer membrane
invaginates and then pinches off to form a vesicle.[24] Some cell products can leave in a vesicle through
exocytosis.[25]
The nucleus is surrounded by a double membrane known as the
nuclear envelope, with
nuclear pores that allow material to move in and out.[26] Various tube- and sheet-like extensions of the nuclear membrane form the
endoplasmic reticulum, which is involved in
protein transport and maturation. It includes the rough endoplasmic reticulum, covered in
ribosomes which synthesize proteins; these enter the interior space or lumen. Subsequently, they generally enter vesicles, which bud off from the smooth endoplasmic reticulum.[27] In most eukaryotes, these protein-carrying vesicles are released and further modified in stacks of flattened vesicles (
cisternae), the
Golgi apparatus.[28]
Mitochondria are organelles in eukaryotic cells. The mitochondrion is commonly called "the powerhouse of the cell",[30] for its function providing energy by oxidising sugars or fats to produce the energy-storing molecule
ATP.[31][32] Mitochondria have two surrounding
membranes, each a
phospholipid bilayer, the
inner of which is folded into invaginations called
cristae where
aerobic respiration takes place.[33]
Mitochondria contain
their own DNA, which has close structural similarities to
bacterial DNA, from which it originated, and which encodes
rRNA and
tRNA genes that produce RNA which is closer in structure to bacterial RNA than to eukaryote RNA.[34]
Some eukaryotes, such as the
metamonadsGiardia and Trichomonas, and the amoebozoan Pelomyxa, appear to lack mitochondria, but all contain mitochondrion-derived organelles, like
hydrogenosomes or
mitosomes, having lost their mitochondria secondarily.[35] They obtain energy by enzymatic action in the cytoplasm.[36][35] It is thought that mitochondria developed from
prokaryotic cells which became
endosymbionts living inside eukaryotes.[37]
Plants and various groups of
algae have plastids as well as mitochondria. Plastids, like mitochondria, have
their own DNA and are developed from
endosymbionts, in this case
cyanobacteria. They usually take the form of
chloroplasts which, like cyanobacteria, contain
chlorophyll and produce organic compounds (such as
glucose) through
photosynthesis. Others are involved in storing food. Although plastids probably had a single origin, not all plastid-containing groups are closely related. Instead, some eukaryotes have obtained them from others through
secondary endosymbiosis or ingestion.[38] The capture and sequestering of photosynthetic cells and chloroplasts,
kleptoplasty, occurs in many types of modern eukaryotic organisms.[39][40]
Many eukaryotes have long slender motile cytoplasmic projections, called
flagella, or multiple shorter structures called
cilia.
These organelles are variously involved in movement, feeding, and sensation. They are composed mainly of
tubulin, and are entirely distinct from prokaryotic flagella. They are supported by a bundle of
microtubules arising from a
centriole, characteristically arranged as nine doublets surrounding two singlets. Flagella may have hairs (
mastigonemes), as in many
stramenopiles. Their interior is continuous with the cell's
cytoplasm.[43][44]
Centrioles are often present, even in cells and groups that do not have flagella, but
conifers and
flowering plants have neither. They generally occur in groups that give rise to various microtubular roots. These form a primary component of the cytoskeleton, and are often assembled over the course of several cell divisions, with one flagellum retained from the parent and the other derived from it. Centrioles produce the spindle during nuclear division.[45]
The cells of plants, algae, fungi and most
chromalveolates, but not animals, are surrounded by a cell wall. This is a layer outside the
cell membrane, providing the cell with structural support, protection, and a filtering mechanism. The cell wall also prevents
over-expansion when water enters the cell.[46]
Eukaryotes have a life cycle that involves
sexual reproduction, alternating between a
haploid phase, where only one copy of each chromosome is present in each cell, and a
diploid phase, with two copies of each chromosome in each cell. The diploid phase is formed by fusion of two haploid gametes, such as
eggs and
spermatozoa, to form a
zygote; this may grow into a body, with its cells dividing by
mitosis, and at some stage produce haploid gametes through
meiosis, a division that reduces the number of chromosomes and creates
genetic variability.[48] There is considerable variation in this pattern. Plants have both
haploid and diploid multicellular phases.[49] Eukaryotes have lower metabolic rates and longer generation times than prokaryotes, because they are larger and therefore have a smaller surface area to volume ratio.[50]
The
evolution of sexual reproduction may be a primordial characteristic of eukaryotes. Based on a phylogenetic analysis, Dacks and
Roger have proposed that facultative sex was present in the group's common ancestor.[51] A core set of genes that function in meiosis is present in both Trichomonas vaginalis and Giardia intestinalis, two organisms previously thought to be asexual.[52][53] Since these two species are descendants of lineages that diverged early from the eukaryotic evolutionary tree, core meiotic genes, and hence sex, were likely present in the common ancestor of eukaryotes.[52][53] Species once thought to be asexual, such as Leishmania parasites, have a sexual cycle.[54] Amoebae, previously regarded as asexual, may be anciently sexual; while present-day asexual groups could have arisen recently.[55]
In
antiquity, the two lineages of
animals and
plants were recognized by
Aristotle and
Theophrastus. The lineages were given the
taxonomic rank of
kingdom by
Linnaeus in the 18th century. Though he included the
fungi with plants with some reservations, it was later realized that they are quite distinct and warrant a separate kingdom.[56] The various single-cell eukaryotes were originally placed with plants or animals when they became known. In 1818, the German biologist
Georg A. Goldfuss coined the word Protozoa to refer to organisms such as
ciliates,[57] and this group was expanded until
Ernst Haeckel made it a kingdom encompassing all single-celled eukaryotes, the
Protista, in 1866.[58][59][60] The eukaryotes thus came to be seen as four kingdoms:
The protists were at that time thought to be "primitive forms", and thus an
evolutionary grade, united by their primitive unicellular nature.[59] Understanding of the oldest branchings in the
tree of life only developed substantially with
DNA sequencing, leading to a system of
domains rather than kingdoms as top level rank being put forward by
Carl Woese,
Otto Kandler, and
Mark Wheelis in 1990, uniting all the eukaryote kingdoms in the domain "Eucarya", stating, however, that "'eukaryotes' will continue to be an acceptable common synonym".[2][61] In 1996, the evolutionary biologist
Lynn Margulis proposed to replace kingdoms and domains with "inclusive" names to create a "symbiosis-based phylogeny", giving the description "Eukarya (symbiosis-derived nucleated organisms)".[3]
Phylogeny
By 2014, a rough consensus started to emerge from the phylogenomic studies of the previous two decades.[11][63] The majority of eukaryotes can be placed in one of two large clades dubbed
Amorphea (similar in composition to the
unikont hypothesis) and the
Diphoda (formerly bikonts), which includes plants and most algal lineages. A third major grouping, the
Excavata, has been abandoned as a formal group as it is
paraphyletic.[64] The proposed phylogeny below includes only one group of excavates (
Discoba),[65] and incorporates the 2021 proposal that
picozoans are close relatives of rhodophytes.[66] The
Provora are a group of microbial predators discovered in 2022.[1]
The origin of the eukaryotic cell, or eukaryogenesis, is a milestone in the evolution of life, since eukaryotes include all complex cells and almost all multicellular organisms. The
last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) is the hypothetical origin of all living eukaryotes,[71] and was most likely a
biological population, not a single individual.[72] The LECA is believed to have been a protist with a nucleus, at least one
centriole and
flagellum, facultatively aerobic mitochondria, sex (
meiosis and
syngamy), a dormant
cyst with a cell wall of
chitin or
cellulose, and
peroxisomes.[73][74][75]
The presence of eukaryotic biomarkers in archaea points towards an archaeal origin. The genomes of
Asgard archaea have plenty of
eukaryotic signature protein genes, which play a crucial role in the development of the
cytoskeleton and complex cellular structures characteristic of eukaryotes. In 2022,
cryo-electron tomography demonstrated that Asgard archaea have a complex
actin-based cytoskeleton, providing the first direct visual evidence of the archaeal ancestry of eukaryotes.[76]
Fossils
The timing of the origin of eukaryotes is hard to determine, but the discovery of Qingshania magnificia, the earliest multicelluar eukaryote from North China which lived 1.635 billion years ago, suggests that the crown group eukaryotes originated from the late
Paleoproterozoic (
Statherian). The earliest unequivocal unicellular eukaryotes, Tappania plana, Shuiyousphaeridium macroreticulatum, Dictyosphaera macroreticulata, Germinosphaera alveolata, and Valeria lophostriata from North China, lived approximately 1.65 billion years ago.[77]
The
Neoarchean fossil Thuchomyces shares similarities with eukaryotes, specifically fungi. It especially resembles the problematic fossil Diskagma,[80] with hyphae and multiple differentiated layers.[81] However, it is over 600 million years older than all other possible eukaryotes, and many of its "eukaryote features" are not specific to the clade, meaning it is almost certainly a microbial mat instead.[82]
Structures proposed to represent "large colonial organisms" have been found in the
black shales of the
Palaeoproterozoic such as the
Francevillian B Formation, in
Gabon, dubbed the "
Francevillian biota" which is dated at 2.1 billion years old.[83][84] However, the status of these structures as fossils is contested, with other authors suggesting that they might represent
pseudofossils.[85] The oldest fossils than can unambiguously be assigned to eukaryotes are from the Ruyang Group of China, dating to approximately 1.8-1.6 billion years ago.[86] Fossils that are clearly related to modern groups start appearing an estimated 1.2 billion years ago, in the form of
red algae, though recent work suggests the existence of fossilized
filamentous algae in the
Vindhya basin dating back perhaps to 1.6 to 1.7 billion years ago.[87]
The presence of
steranes, eukaryotic-specific
biomarkers, in
Australianshales previously indicated that eukaryotes were present in these rocks dated at 2.7 billion years old,[21][88] but these Archaean biomarkers have been rebutted as later contaminants.[89] The oldest valid biomarker records are only around 800 million years old.[90] In contrast, a molecular clock analysis suggests the emergence of sterol biosynthesis as early as 2.3 billion years ago.[91] The nature of steranes as eukaryotic biomarkers is further complicated by the production of
sterols by some bacteria.[92][93]
Whenever their origins, eukaryotes may not have become ecologically dominant until much later; a massive increase in the
zinc composition of marine sediments 800 million years ago has been attributed to the rise of substantial populations of eukaryotes, which preferentially consume and incorporate
zinc relative to prokaryotes, approximately a billion years after their origin (at the latest).[94]
^Zick M, Rabl R, Reichert AS (January 2009). "Cristae formation-linking ultrastructure and function of mitochondria". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research. 1793 (1): 5–19.
doi:
10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.06.013.
PMID18620004.
^Sato N (2006). "Origin and Evolution of Plastids: Genomic View on the Unification and Diversity of Plastids". In Wise RR, Hoober JK (eds.). The Structure and Function of Plastids. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. Vol. 23. Springer Netherlands. pp. 75–102.
doi:
10.1007/978-1-4020-4061-0_4.
ISBN978-1-4020-4060-3.
^Minnhagen S, Carvalho WF, Salomon PS, Janson S (September 2008). "Chloroplast DNA content in Dinophysis (Dinophyceae) from different cell cycle stages is consistent with kleptoplasty". Environ. Microbiol. 10 (9): 2411–7.
Bibcode:
2008EnvMi..10.2411M.
doi:
10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01666.x.
PMID18518896.
^Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (1 January 2002). "Molecular Motors".
Molecular Biology of the Cell (4th ed.). New York: Garland Science.
ISBN978-0-8153-3218-3.
Archived from the original on 8 March 2019. Retrieved 6 April 2023.
^Moore RT (1980). "Taxonomic proposals for the classification of marine yeasts and other yeast-like fungi including the smuts". Botanica Marina. 23 (6): 361–373.
doi:
10.1515/bot-1980-230605.
^Goldfuß (1818).
"Ueber die Classification der Zoophyten" [On the classification of zoophytes]. Isis, Oder, Encyclopädische Zeitung von Oken (in German). 2 (6): 1008–1019.
Archived from the original on 24 March 2019. Retrieved 15 March 2019. From p. 1008: "Erste Klasse. Urthiere. Protozoa." (First class. Primordial animals. Protozoa.) [Note: each column of each page of this journal is numbered; there are two columns per page.]
^
abcdRetallack GJ, Krull ES, Thackray GD, Parkinson DH (2013). "Problematic urn-shaped fossils from a Paleoproterozoic (2.2 Ga) paleosol in South Africa". Precambrian Research. 235: 71–87.
Bibcode:
2013PreR..235...71R.
doi:
10.1016/j.precamres.2013.05.015.
^Hallbauer, D. K.; Jahns, H. M.; Beltmann, H. A. (December 1977). "Morphological and anatomical observations on some precambrian plants from the Witwatersrand, South Africa". Geologische Rundschau. 66 (1): 477–491.
doi:
10.1007/BF01989590.
^Lücking, Robert; Nelsen, Matthew P. (2018). "Ediacarans, Protolichens, and Lichen-Derived Penicillium". Transformative Paleobotany: 551–590.
doi:
10.1016/B978-0-12-813012-4.00023-1.