This article needs additional citations for
verification. (January 2022) 
A decimal representation of a nonnegative real number r is its expression as a sequence of symbols consisting of decimal digits traditionally written with a single separator:
Commonly, if The sequence of the —the digits after the dot—is generally infinite. If it is finite, the lacking digits are assumed to be 0. If all are 0, the separator is also omitted, resulting in a finite sequence of digits, which represents a natural number.
The decimal representation represents the infinite sum:
Every nonnegative real number has at least one such representation; it has two such representations (with if ) if and only if one has a trailing infinite sequence of 0, and the other has a trailing infinite sequence of 9. For having a onetoone correspondence between nonnegative real numbers and decimal representations, decimal representations with a trailing infinite sequence of 9 are sometimes excluded.^{ [1]}
The natural number , is called the integer part of r, and is denoted by a_{0} in the remainder of this article. The sequence of the represents the number
Any real number can be approximated to any desired degree of accuracy by rational numbers with finite decimal representations.
Assume . Then for every integer there is a finite decimal such that:
Proof: Let , where . Then , and the result follows from dividing all sides by . (The fact that has a finite decimal representation is easily established.)
Some real numbers have two infinite decimal representations. For example, the number 1 may be equally represented by 1.000... as by 0.999... (where the infinite sequences of trailing 0's or 9's, respectively, are represented by "..."). Conventionally, the decimal representation without trailing 9's is preferred. Moreover, in the standard decimal representation of , an infinite sequence of trailing 0's appearing after the decimal point is omitted, along with the decimal point itself if is an integer.
Certain procedures for constructing the decimal expansion of will avoid the problem of trailing 9's. For instance, the following algorithmic procedure will give the standard decimal representation: Given , we first define (the integer part of ) to be the largest integer such that (i.e., ). If the procedure terminates. Otherwise, for already found, we define inductively to be the largest integer such that:

(*) 
The procedure terminates whenever is found such that equality holds in ( *); otherwise, it continues indefinitely to give an infinite sequence of decimal digits. It can be shown that ^{ [2]} (conventionally written as ), where and the nonnegative integer is represented in decimal notation. This construction is extended to by applying the above procedure to and denoting the resultant decimal expansion by .
The decimal expansion of nonnegative real number x will end in zeros (or in nines) if, and only if, x is a rational number whose denominator is of the form 2^{n}5^{m}, where m and n are nonnegative integers.
Proof:
If the decimal expansion of x will end in zeros, or for some n, then the denominator of x is of the form 10^{n} = 2^{n}5^{n}.
Conversely, if the denominator of x is of the form 2^{n}5^{m}, for some p. While x is of the form , for some n. By , x will end in zeros.
Some real numbers have decimal expansions that eventually get into loops, endlessly repeating a sequence of one or more digits:
Every time this happens the number is still a rational number (i.e. can alternatively be represented as a ratio of an integer and a positive integer). Also the converse is true: The decimal expansion of a rational number is either finite, or endlessly repeating.
Every decimal representation of a rational number can be converted to a fraction by converting it into a sum of the integer, nonrepeating, and repeating parts and then converting that sum to a single fraction with a common denominator.
For example to convert to a fraction one notes the lemma:
Thus one converts as follows:
If there are no repeating digits one assumes that there is a forever repeating 0, e.g. , although since that makes the repeating term zero the sum simplifies to two terms and a simpler conversion.
For example: