The ray-finned
fishes are so called because their fins are webs of skin supported by bony or horny spines (rays), as opposed to the fleshy, lobed fins that characterize the class
Sarcopterygii (lobe-finned fish). These actinopterygian fin rays attach directly to the proximal or basal skeletal elements, the radials, which represent the link or connection between these fins and the internal skeleton (e.g., pelvic and pectoral girdles).
By species count, actinopterygians dominate the
vertebrates, and they constitute nearly 99% of the over 30,000 species of fish.[4] They are ubiquitous throughout
freshwater and
marine environments from the deep sea to the highest mountain streams. Extant species can range in size from Paedocypris, at 8 mm (0.3 in), to the massive
ocean sunfish, at 2,300 kg (5,070 lb), and the long-bodied
oarfish, at 11 m (36 ft). The vast majority of Actinopterygii (~99%) are
teleosts.
Ray-finned fishes occur in many variant forms. The main features of typical ray-finned fish are shown in the adjacent diagram. The swim bladder is a more derived structure than the lung.[5]
Ray-finned fishes have many different types of scales; but all
teleosts have
leptoid scales. The outer part of these scales fan out with bony ridges, while the inner part is crossed with fibrous connective tissue. Leptoid scales are thinner and more transparent than other types of scales, and lack the hardened enamel or dentine-like layers found in the scales of many other fish. Unlike ganoid scales, which are found in non-teleost actinopterygians, new scales are added in concentric layers as the fish grows.[6]
Ray-finned and lobe-finned fishes sometimes possesses lungs used for aerial respiration. Only bichirs retain ventrally budding lungs.[5]
Gars (along with the
bowfin) are the only surviving members of the
Holostei
Reproduction
Three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) males (red belly) build nests and compete to attract females to lay eggs in them. Males then defend and fan the eggs. Painting by
Alexander Francis Lydon, 1879
In nearly all ray-finned fish, the sexes are separate, and in most species the females spawn eggs that are fertilized externally, typically with the male inseminating the eggs after they are laid. Development then proceeds with a free-swimming larval stage.[7] However other patterns of
ontogeny exist, with one of the commonest being
sequential hermaphroditism. In most cases this involves
protogyny, fish starting life as females and converting to males at some stage, triggered by some internal or external factor.
Protandry, where a fish converts from male to female, is much less common than protogyny.[8]
Most families use
external rather than
internal fertilization.[9] Of the
oviparous teleosts, most (79%) do not provide parental care.[10]Viviparity,
ovoviviparity, or some form of parental care for eggs, whether by the male, the female, or both parents is seen in a significant fraction (21%) of the 422 teleost families; no care is likely the ancestral condition.[10] The oldest case of viviparity in ray-finned fish is found in
Middle Triassic species of
†Saurichthys.[11] Viviparity is relatively rare and is found in about 6% of living teleost species; male care is far more common than female care.[10][12] Male territoriality
"preadapts" a species for evolving male parental care.[13][14]
There are a few examples of fish that self-fertilise. The
mangrove rivulus is an amphibious, simultaneous hermaphrodite, producing both eggs and spawn and having internal fertilisation. This mode of reproduction may be related to the fish's habit of spending long periods out of water in the mangrove forests it inhabits. Males are occasionally produced at temperatures below 19 °C (66 °F) and can fertilise eggs that are then spawned by the female. This maintains genetic variability in a species that is otherwise highly inbred.[15]
The polypterids (bichirs and reedfish) are the
sister lineage of all other actinopterygians, the Acipenseriformes (sturgeons and paddlefishes) are the sister lineage of Neopterygii, and Holostei (bowfin and gars) are the sister lineage of teleosts. The
Elopomorpha (
eels and
tarpons) appear to be the most
basal teleosts.[17]
Chondrostei(cartilage bone) is a subclass of primarily
cartilaginous fish showing some
ossification. Earlier definitions of Chondrostei are now known to be
paraphyletic, meaning that this subclass does not contain all the descendants of their common ancestor. There used to be 52 species divided among two orders, the
Acipenseriformes (
sturgeons and
paddlefishes) and the
Polypteriformes (
reedfishes and
bichirs). Reedfish and birchirs are now separated from the Chondrostei into their own sister lineage, the
Cladistia. It is thought that the chondrosteans evolved from bony fish but lost the bony hardening of their cartilaginous skeletons, resulting in a lightening of the frame. Elderly chondrosteans show beginnings of ossification of the skeleton, suggesting that this process is delayed rather than lost in these fish.[24] This group had once been classified with the
sharks: the similarities are obvious, as not only do the chondrosteans mostly lack bone, but the structure of the jaw is more akin to that of sharks than other bony fish, and both lack
scales (excluding the Polypteriforms). Additional shared features include
spiracles and, in sturgeons, a heterocercal tail (the
vertebrae extend into the larger lobe of the
caudal fin). However the fossil record suggests that these fish have more in common with the
Teleostei than their external appearance might suggest.[24]
Neopterygii(new fins) is a subclass of ray-finned fish that appeared somewhere in the Late
Permian. There were only few changes during its evolution from the earlier actinopterygians. Neopterygians are a very successful group of fishes because they can move more rapidly than their ancestors. Their scales and skeletons began to lighten during their evolution, and their jaws became more powerful and efficient. While
electroreception and the
ampullae of Lorenzini is present in all other groups of fish, with the exception of
hagfish, neopterygians have lost this sense, though it later re-evolved within
Gymnotiformes and
catfishes, who possess nonhomologous teleost ampullae.[25]
Skeleton of the angler fish, Lophius piscatorius. The first spine of the dorsal fin of the anglerfish is modified so it functions like a fishing rod with a lure
^Maxwell; et al. (2018). "Re‐evaluation of the ontogeny and reproductive biology of the Triassic fish Saurichthys (Actinopterygii, Saurichthyidae)". Palaeontology. 61: 559–574.
doi:
10.5061/dryad.vc8h5.
^Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
^Baylis, Jeffrey (1981). "The Evolution of Parental Care in Fishes, with reference to Darwin's rule of male sexual selection". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 6 (2): 223–251.
doi:
10.1007/BF00002788.
S2CID19242013.
^Laurin, M.; Reisz, R.R. (1995). "A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 113 (2): 165–223.
doi:
10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00932.x.
^Arratia, G. (2015). "Complexities of early teleostei and the evolution of particular morphological structures through time". Copeia. 103 (4): 999–1025.
doi:
10.1643/CG-14-184.
S2CID85808890.
^Romano, Carlo; Koot, Martha B.; Kogan, Ilja; Brayard, Arnaud; Minikh, Alla V.; Brinkmann, Winand; Bucher, Hugo; Kriwet, Jürgen (February 2016). "Permian-Triassic Osteichthyes (bony fishes): diversity dynamics and body size evolution". Biological Reviews. 91 (1): 106–147.
doi:
10.1111/brv.12161.
PMID25431138.
S2CID5332637.