# Abstract algebra Information

*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_algebra*

This article includes a list of general
references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding
inline citations. (June 2019) |

In
algebra, which is a broad division of
mathematics, **abstract algebra** (occasionally called **modern algebra**) is the study of
algebraic structures. Algebraic structures include
groups,
rings,
fields,
modules,
vector spaces,
lattices, and
algebras. The term *abstract algebra* was coined in the early 20th century to distinguish this area of study from older parts of algebra, and more specifically from
elementary algebra, the use of
variables to represent numbers in computation and reasoning.

Algebraic structures, with their associated homomorphisms, form mathematical categories. Category theory is a formalism that allows a unified way for expressing properties and constructions that are similar for various structures.

Universal algebra is a related subject that studies types of algebraic structures as single objects. For example, the structure of groups is a single object in universal algebra, which is called the *
variety of groups*.

## History

As in other parts of mathematics, concrete problems and examples have played important roles in the development of abstract algebra. Through the end of the nineteenth century, many – perhaps most – of these problems were in some way related to the theory of algebraic equations. Major themes include:

- Solving of systems of linear equations, which led to linear algebra
- Attempts to find formulas for solutions of general polynomial equations of higher degree that resulted in discovery of groups as abstract manifestations of symmetry
- Arithmetical investigations of quadratic and higher-degree forms and diophantine equations, that directly produced the notions of a ring and ideal.

Numerous textbooks in abstract algebra start with
axiomatic definitions of various
algebraic structures and then proceed to establish their properties. This creates a false impression that in algebra axioms had come first and then served as a motivation and as a basis of further study. The true order of historical development was almost exactly the opposite. For example, the
hypercomplex numbers of the nineteenth century had
kinematics and physical motivations but challenged comprehension. Most theories that are now recognized as parts of algebra started as collections of disparate facts from various branches of mathematics, acquired a common theme that served as a core around which various results were grouped, and finally became unified on a basis of a common set of concepts. An archetypical example of this progressive synthesis can be seen in the
history of group theory.^{[
citation needed]}

### Early group theory

There were several threads in the early development of group theory, in modern language loosely corresponding to *number theory*, *theory of equations*, and *geometry*.

Leonhard Euler considered
algebraic operations on numbers modulo an integer—
modular arithmetic—in
his generalization of
Fermat's little theorem. These investigations were taken much further by
Carl Friedrich Gauss, who considered the structure of multiplicative groups of residues mod n and established many properties of
cyclic and more general
abelian groups that arise in this way. In his investigations of
composition of binary quadratic forms, Gauss explicitly stated the
associative law for the composition of forms, but like Euler before him, he seems to have been more interested in concrete results than in general theory. In 1870,
Leopold Kronecker gave a definition of an abelian group in the context of
ideal class groups of a number field, generalizing Gauss's work; but it appears he did not tie his definition with previous work on groups, particularly permutation groups. In 1882, considering the same question,
Heinrich M. Weber realized the connection and gave a similar definition that involved the
cancellation property but omitted the existence of the
inverse element, which was sufficient in his context (finite groups).^{[
citation needed]}

Permutations were studied by
Joseph-Louis Lagrange in his 1770 paper *Réflexions sur la résolution algébrique des équations (Thoughts on the algebraic solution of equations)* devoted to solutions of algebraic equations, in which he introduced
Lagrange resolvents. Lagrange's goal was to understand why equations of third and fourth degree admit formulas for solutions, and he identified as key objects permutations of the roots. An important novel step taken by Lagrange in this paper was the abstract view of the roots, i.e. as symbols and not as numbers. However, he did not consider composition of permutations. Serendipitously, the first edition of
Edward Waring's *Meditationes Algebraicae* (*Meditations on Algebra*) appeared in the same year, with an expanded version published in 1782. Waring proved the
fundamental theorem of symmetric polynomials, and specially considered the relation between the roots of a quartic equation and its resolvent cubic. *Mémoire sur la résolution des équations* (*Memoire on the Solving of Equations*) of
Alexandre Vandermonde (1771) developed the theory of symmetric functions from a slightly different angle, but like Lagrange, with the goal of understanding solvability of algebraic equations.

Kronecker claimed in 1888 that the study of modern algebra began with this first paper of Vandermonde. Cauchy states quite clearly that Vandermonde had priority over Lagrange for this remarkable idea, which eventually led to the study of group theory.

^{ [1]}

Paolo Ruffini was the first person to develop the theory of permutation groups, and like his predecessors, also in the context of solving algebraic equations. His goal was to establish the impossibility of an algebraic solution to a general algebraic equation of degree greater than four. En route to this goal he introduced the notion of the order of an element of a group, conjugacy, the cycle decomposition of elements of permutation groups and the notions of primitive and imprimitive and proved some important theorems relating these concepts, such as

if G is a subgroup of S

_{5}whose order is divisible by 5 then G contains an element of order 5.

However, he got by without formalizing the concept of a group, or even of a permutation group.
The next step was taken by
Évariste Galois in 1832, although his work remained unpublished until 1846, when he considered for the first time what is now called the *closure property* of a group of permutations, which he expressed as

if in such a group one has the substitutions S and T then one has the substitution ST.

The theory of permutation groups received further far-reaching development in the hands of
Augustin Cauchy and
Camille Jordan, both through introduction of new concepts and, primarily, a great wealth of results about special classes of permutation groups and even some general theorems. Among other things, Jordan defined a notion of
isomorphism, still in the context of permutation groups and, incidentally, it was he who put the term *group* in wide use.

The abstract notion of a group appeared for the first time in
Arthur Cayley's papers in 1854. Cayley realized that a group need not be a permutation group (or even *finite*), and may instead consist of
matrices, whose algebraic properties, such as multiplication and inverses, he systematically investigated in succeeding years. Much later Cayley would revisit the question whether abstract groups were more general than permutation groups, and establish that, in fact, any group is isomorphic to a group of permutations.

### Modern algebra

The end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century saw a shift in the methodology of mathematics. Abstract algebra emerged around the start of the 20th century, under the name *modern algebra*. Its study was part of the drive for more
intellectual rigor in mathematics. Initially, the assumptions in classical
algebra, on which the whole of mathematics (and major parts of the
natural sciences) depend, took the form of
axiomatic systems. No longer satisfied with establishing properties of concrete objects, mathematicians started to turn their attention to general theory. Formal definitions of certain
algebraic structures began to emerge in the 19th century. For example, results about various groups of permutations came to be seen as instances of general theorems that concern a general notion of an *abstract group*. Questions of structure and classification of various mathematical objects came to forefront.

These processes were occurring throughout all of mathematics, but became especially pronounced in algebra. Formal definition through primitive operations and axioms were proposed for many basic algebraic structures, such as
groups,
rings, and
fields. Hence such things as
group theory and
ring theory took their places in
pure mathematics. The algebraic investigations of general fields by
Ernst Steinitz and of commutative and then general rings by
David Hilbert,
Emil Artin and
Emmy Noether, building up on the work of
Ernst Kummer,
Leopold Kronecker and
Richard Dedekind, who had considered ideals in commutative rings, and of
Georg Frobenius and
Issai Schur, concerning
representation theory of groups, came to define abstract algebra. These developments of the last quarter of the 19th century and the first quarter of 20th century were systematically exposed in
Bartel van der Waerden's *
Moderne Algebra*, the two-volume
monograph published in 1930–1931 that forever changed for the mathematical world the meaning of the word *algebra* from *the theory of equations* to the *theory of algebraic structures*.

## Basic concepts

By abstracting away various amounts of detail, mathematicians have defined various algebraic structures that are used in many areas of mathematics. For instance, almost all systems studied are sets, to which the theorems of set theory apply. Those sets that have a certain binary operation defined on them form magmas, to which the concepts concerning magmas, as well those concerning sets, apply. We can add additional constraints on the algebraic structure, such as associativity (to form semigroups); identity, and inverses (to form groups); and other more complex structures. With additional structure, more theorems could be proved, but the generality is reduced. The "hierarchy" of algebraic objects (in terms of generality) creates a hierarchy of the corresponding theories: for instance, the theorems of group theory may be used when studying rings (algebraic objects that have two binary operations with certain axioms) since a ring is a group over one of its operations. In general there is a balance between the amount of generality and the richness of the theory: more general structures have usually fewer nontrivial theorems and fewer applications.

Examples of algebraic structures with a single binary operation are:

Examples involving several operations include:

## Applications

Because of its generality, abstract algebra is used in many fields of mathematics and science. For instance, algebraic topology uses algebraic objects to study topologies. The Poincaré conjecture, proved in 2003, asserts that the fundamental group of a manifold, which encodes information about connectedness, can be used to determine whether a manifold is a sphere or not. Algebraic number theory studies various number rings that generalize the set of integers. Using tools of algebraic number theory, Andrew Wiles proved Fermat's Last Theorem.

In physics, groups are used to represent symmetry operations, and the usage of group theory could simplify differential equations. In
gauge theory, the requirement of
local symmetry can be used to deduce the equations describing a system. The groups that describe those symmetries are
Lie groups, and the study of Lie groups and Lie algebras reveals much about the physical system; for instance, the number of
force carriers in a theory is equal to the dimension of the Lie algebra, and these
bosons interact with the force they mediate if the Lie algebra is nonabelian.^{
[2]}

## See also

## References

**^**O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Alexandre-Théophile Vandermonde",*MacTutor History of Mathematics archive*, University of St Andrews**^**Schumm, Bruce (2004),*Deep Down Things*, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 0-8018-7971-X

## Sources

- Allenby, R. B. J. T. (1991),
*Rings, Fields and Groups*, Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 978-0-340-54440-2 -
Artin, Michael (1991),
*Algebra*, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0-89871-510-1 - Burris, Stanley N.; Sankappanavar, H. P. (1999) [1981],
*A Course in Universal Algebra* - Gilbert, Jimmie; Gilbert, Linda (2005),
*Elements of Modern Algebra*, Thomson Brooks/Cole, ISBN 978-0-534-40264-8 -
Lang, Serge (2002),
*Algebra*, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 211 (Revised third ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-95385-4, MR 1878556 - Sethuraman, B. A. (1996),
*Rings, Fields, Vector Spaces, and Group Theory: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra via Geometric Constructibility*, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-94848-5 - Whitehead, C. (2002),
*Guide to Abstract Algebra*(2nd ed.), Houndmills: Palgrave, ISBN 978-0-333-79447-0 - W. Keith Nicholson (2012)
*Introduction to Abstract Algebra*, 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons ISBN 978-1-118-13535-8 . - John R. Durbin (1992)
*Modern Algebra : an introduction*, John Wiley & Sons

## External links

Wikibooks has more on the topic of:
Abstract algebra |

- Charles C. Pinter (1990) [1982]
*A Book of Abstract Algebra*, second edition, from University of Maryland