This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2014) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Technology shocks are sudden changes in technology that significantly affect economic, social, political or other outcomes.  In economics, the term technology shock usually refers to events in a macroeconomic model, that change the production function. Usually this is modeled with an aggregate production function that has a scaling factor.
Normally reference is made to positive (i.e., productivity enhancing) technological changes, though technology shocks can also be contractionary.  The term “shock” connotes the fact that technological progress is not always gradual – there can be large-scale discontinuous changes that significantly alter production methods and outputs in an industry, or in the economy as a whole. Such a technology shock can occur in many different ways.  For example, it may be the result of advances in science that enable new trajectories of innovation, or may result when an existing technological alternative improves to a point that it overtakes the dominant design, or is transplanted to a new domain. It can also occur as the result of a shock in another system, such as when a change in input prices dramatically changes the price/performance relationship for a technology,  or when a change in the regulatory environment significantly alters the technologies permitted (or demanded) in the market. ANumerous studies have shown that technology shocks can have a significant effect on investment, economic growth, labor productivity, collaboration patterns, and innovation. 
The Industrial Revolution is an example of a positive technology shock. The Industrial Revolution occurred between the 18th and the 19th centuries where major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, transport, and technology occurred. 
What this did to the economy at the time was notable. It increased wages steadily over the period of time and it also increased population because people had the wages for standard living. This is an example of a positive technology shock, where it increases national and disposable income, and also increases the labor force. The Industrial Revolution also provided a much more efficient way to produce goods which lead to less labor-intensive work. 
The rise of the internet, which coincided with rapid innovation in related networking equipment and software, also caused a major shock to the economy.   The internet was a “general purpose technology” with the potential to transform information dissemination on a massive scale. The shock created both great opportunity and great uncertainty for firms, precipitating large increases in alliance activity and an increase in innovation across a wide range of sectors. 
The oil shocks that occurred in the late 1970s are examples of negative technology shocks. When the oil shocks occurred, the energy that was used to extract to oil became more expensive, the energy was the technology in this case.[ clarification needed] The price of the capital and the labor both went up due to this shock,  and this is an example of a negative technology shock.
There are many examples of different types of technology shocks, but one of the biggest in the past couple of decades has been Web 2.0. Web 2.0 was a huge technological advancement in the e commerce business, it allowed for user interaction benefiting businesses in different ways.  It allowed for user feedback, ratings, comments, user content, etc. Web 2.0 revolutionized the online business as a whole, an example of a positive technology shock.
Real business cycle theory (RBCT) is the theory where any type of shock has a ripple effect into many other shocks. To relate this to current times the upward price on oil is a RBCT because of the negative technology shock that happened due to the raise in price for the process of extracting of the oil. Now due to this increase in price for energy to extract the oil, fewer people could afford oil which drove economic activity down and at the same time lessens a countries national GDP. Typically, a RBCT starts with a negative type of shock, which is why the RBCT is becoming less and less relevant in today's economics. More and more economists are arguing against the RBCT because very rarely can you have a negative shock on technology with the amount of advancements we are going through now. 
- Schilling, M. A. (2015). "Technology Shocks, Technological Collaboration, and Innovation Outcomes". Organization Science. 26 (3): 668–686. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0970.
- Basu, S., Fernald, J.G., Kimball, M.S. (2006) "Are technology improvements contractionary?" American Economic Review 96:1418-1448.
- Schilling, M. A. (2015). "Technology Shocks, Technological Collaboration, and Innovation Outcomes". Organization Science 26 (3): 668–686. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0970.
- Ehrnberg, E. (1995) "On the definition and measurement of technological discontinuities." Technovation Volume 15, Issue 7, September 1995, pp. 437-452.
- Alexopoulos, M. (2011) "What Happens Following a Technology Shock?" American Economic Review, 101 (4): 1144-79. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.4.1144; Christiano, L.J. Eichenbaum, M. and Vigfusson, R.J. (2003) What Happens after a Technology Shock? NBER Working Paper No. w9819. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=421780; Galí, J. (1999) "Technology, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations?" American Economic Review 89 (1): 249-271; Schilling, M. A. (2015). "Technology Shocks, Technological Collaboration, and Innovation Outcomes". Organization Science 26 (3): 668–686. doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0970.
- Landes, David S. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge, New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. ISBN 0-521-09418-6.
- Schilling, M. A. (2015). "Technology Shocks, Technological Collaboration, and Innovation Outcomes". Organization Science. 26 (3): 668–686. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0970.
- Jorgenson, D. W. (2001). "Information technology and the U.S. Economy". American Economic Review. 91 (1): 1–32. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.1.1.
- "Technology Shocks". Econterms. Retrieved 12 August 2014. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter ( link)
- Kabir, Nowshade.
"Web 2.0 in eCommerce".
http://ezine.rusbiz.com/. Retrieved 12 August 2014. External link in
|publisher=( help)CS1 maint: discouraged parameter ( link)
- Shea, John (July 1998). "What Do Technology Shocks Do?". NBER Working Paper No. 6632. doi: 10.3386/w6632.