|Alexander v. Yale|
|Court||United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|
|Full case name||Ronni Alexander, Ann Olivarius, Pamela Price, Margery Reifler and Lisa Stone v. Yale University|
|Argued||April 16, 1980|
|Decided||September 22, 1980|
|Citation(s)||631 F.2d 178|
|Judge(s) sitting||Joseph Edward Lumbard, William Hughes Mulligan, Adrian A. Spears ( W.D. Tex.)|
|Majority||Lumbard, joined by a unanimous court|
|Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq.|
Alexander v. Yale, 631 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1980),  was the first use of Title IX  in charges of sexual harassment against an educational institution.  It further established that sexual harassment of female students could be considered sex discrimination, and was thus illegal.
Alexander and Reifler alleged that they were sexually harassed by a flute teacher ( Keith Brion) and hockey coach, respectively, and that Yale provided no procedure through which they could complain. Pamela Price alleged a classic case of what is now known as quid pro quo sexual harassment, when a course instructor offered to give her an ‘A’ if she complied with his sexual demands. Lisa Stone alleged that her discussions with a fellow female student who had been harassed and could not make a complaint distressed her and deprived her of the tranquil atmosphere necessary to her education. Ann Olivarius alleged that the absence of a procedure for complaining about sexual harassment forced her to expend her own time and money on helping fellow students who had been sexually harassed, and that in the course of providing that help she was threatened by individuals whom she was investigating, and that Yale failed to protect her from those individuals.
At the district court level, a male faculty member and Lisa Stone's thesis adviser, John Winkler, alleged that the poisoned atmosphere arising from sexual harassment made a good relationship with his students impossible.  He did not join the other plaintiffs’ appeal.
The plaintiffs did not seek damages from Yale. Rather, they wanted the court to order Yale to set up a grievance procedure for students who felt they had been sexually harassed.
The students were advised by Catharine MacKinnon, who had just graduated from Yale Law School.  MacKinnon was working on her groundbreaking book, Sexual Harassment of Working Women, and shared pre-publication copies with the Women’s Rights Litigation Clinic at Rutgers Law School, which represented Alexander and her co-plaintiffs.  Alexander v. Yale was an early test of MacKinnon’s theory that sexual harassment constituted sex discrimination.[ citation needed]
The plaintiffs argued that sexual harassment constituted sex discrimination and that Yale University was thus in contravention of Title IX, which stated that educational institutions receiving federal money could not discriminate on the basis of sex. This novel legal strategy, which made use of Title IX, was developed by MacKinnon, Olivarius (then still an undergraduate), and Anne E. Simon, then working for the New Haven Law Collective and now a California Public Utilities Commission Administrative Law Judge.  The District Court upheld their legal argument, ruling that, “It is perfectly reasonable to maintain that academic advancement conditioned upon submission to sexual demands constitutes sex discrimination in education.” The Court, however, found that Price had not been sexually propositioned in exchange for better grades. It dismissed the other plaintiffs’ allegations as either moot because they had graduated, or untenable.[ citation needed]
The women appealed. Equal Rights Advocates (ERA) and Women Organized Against Sexual Harassment (WOASH) filed a joint friend-of-the-court brief when Alexander v. Yale was appealed.  Another amicus brief was filed jointly by the ACLU and others.[ citation needed] The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the judgment of the lower court, holding in addition that the allegations were no longer relevant because Yale had instituted a grievance procedure. 
Although the women did not win their case, they achieved their objectives: Yale instituted a grievance procedure and a court held that sexual harassment constituted sex discrimination. 
As a result of Alexander v. Yale most U.S. universities instituted grievance procedures for sexual harassment. 
Three of the five plaintiffs – Ann Olivarius, Pamela Price and Ronni Alexander – have gone on to be prominent attorneys or law professors.
- Full text of the judgment
- A history of efforts against sexual harassment at Yale
- To break the silence - an account of Alexander v. Yale
- How A Title IX Harassment Case At Yale In 1980 Set The Stage For Today’s Sexual Assault Activism
- Title IX: Taking Yale to Court
- Alexander v. Yale, 631 F.2d 178 (2d Cir. 1980).
- Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-06-24. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
- Nicole Allen, To break the silence.
- Frances Olsen, Feminist Theory in Grand Style, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 1147, 1147 & n.4 (1989) (citing Conversation with Professor Nadine Taub, attorney with Rutgers Law School Women's Rights Litigation Clinic who litigated early sexual harassment cases (July 1985))
- For Simon's account of the case, see “Alexander v. Yale University: An Informal History,” Directions in Sexual Harassment Law, Catherine A. MacKinnon and Reva B. Siegel, eds, 2007, Yale University Press, pp. 51-59.
- Carrie N. Baker, The women’s movement against sexual harassment, 92.
- Alexander v. Yale, 631 F.2d 178 (2nd Cir. 1980) II. 4
- Alexander v. Yale, 631 F.2d 178 (2nd Cir. 1980) II. 4
- Catharine MacKinnon and Reva Siegel, eds. Directions in Sexual Harassment Law.
- Diane Henry ‘Yale Faculty Members Charged With Sexual Harassment in Suit’ The New York Times, August 22, 1977.
- ‘The Law: Man and Bod at Yale’ Time, August 8, 1977. ‘Sexes: Fighting Lechery on Campus’ Time, February 4, 1980.
- Anne Nelson ‘Sexual Harassment at Yale’ The Nation, January 7, 1978.
- Carrie N. Baker The women’s movement against sexual harassment, 104.
- Ashlyn K. Kuersten Women and the Law: leaders, cases, and documents, 160.