Agriculture is a major industry in the United States, which is a net exporter of food.  As of the 2007 census of agriculture, there were 2.2 million farms, covering an area of 922 million acres (3,730,000 km2), an average of 418 acres (169 hectares) per farm.  Although agricultural activity occurs in every state in the union, it is particularly concentrated in the Great Plains, a vast expanse of flat, arable land in the center of the nation in the region around the Great Lakes known as the Corn Belt. 
The U.S. was a leader in seed improvement i.e. hybridization and in expanding uses for crops from the work of George Washington Carver to the development of bioplastics and biofuels. The mechanization of farming and intensive farming have been major themes in U.S. history, including John Deere's steel plow, Cyrus McCormick's mechanical reaper, Eli Whitney's cotton gin to the widespread success of the Fordson tractor and the combine harvesters first made from them. Modern agriculture in the U.S. ranges from the common hobby farms, small-scale producers to large commercial farming covering thousands of acres of cropland or rangeland.
- 1 History
- 2 Major agricultural products
- 3 Farm type or majority enterprise type
- 4 Governance
- 5 Employment
- 6 Occupational safety and health
- 7 Women in U.S. agriculture
- 8 See also
- 9 Further reading
- 10 References
- 11 External links
European agricultural practices greatly affected the New England landscape. Colonists brought livestock over from Europe which caused many changes to the land. Grazing animals required a lot of land and food and the act of grazing itself destroyed native grasses, which were being replaced by European species. New species of weeds were introduced and began to thrive as they were capable of withstanding the grazing of animals, whereas native species could not. 
The practices associated with keeping livestock also contributed to the deterioration of the forests and fields. Colonists would cut down the trees and then allow their cattle and livestock to graze freely in the forest and never plant more trees. The animals trampled and tore up the ground so much as to cause long-term destruction and damage. 
Soil exhaustion was a huge problem in New England agriculture. Farming with oxen did allow the colonist to farm more land but it increased erosion and decreased soil fertility. This was due to deeper plow cuts in the soil that allowed the soil more contact with oxygen causing nutrient depletion. In grazing fields, the large number of cattle in the New England, the soil was being compacted by the cattle and this did not give the soil enough oxygen to sustain life. 
In the United States, farms spread from the colonies westward along with the settlers. In cooler regions, wheat was often the crop of choice when lands were newly settled, leading to a "wheat frontier" that moved westward over the course of years. Also very common in the antebellum Midwest was farming corn while raising hogs, complementing each other especially since it was difficult to get grain to market before the canals and railroads. After the "wheat frontier" had passed through an area, more diversified farms including dairy cattle generally took its place. Warmer regions saw plantings of cotton and herds of beef cattle. In the early colonial south, raising tobacco and cotton was common, especially through the use of slave labor until the Civil War. In the northeast, slaves were used in agriculture until the early 19th century.[ citation needed] In the Midwest, slavery was prohibited by the Freedom Ordinance of 1787.
The introduction and broad adoption of scientific agriculture since the mid-19th century contributed to economic growth in the United States. This development was facilitated by the Morrill Act and the Hatch Act of 1887 which established in each state a land-grant university (with a mission to teach and study agriculture) and a federally funded system of agricultural experiment stations and cooperative extension networks which place extension agents in each state.
Soybeans were not widely cultivated in the United States until the early 1930s, and by 1942 it became the world's largest soybean producer, due in part to World War II and the "need for domestic sources of fats, oils, and meal". Between 1930 and 1942, the United States' share of world soybean production grew from 3% to 47%, and by 1969 it had risen to 76%. By 1973 soybeans were the United States' "number one cash crop, and leading export commodity, ahead of both wheat and corn". 
Significant areas of farmland were abandoned during the Great Depression and incorporated into nascent national forests. Later, "Sodbuster" and "Swampbuster" restrictions written into federal farm programs starting in the 1970s reversed a decades-long trend of habitat destruction that began in 1942 when farmers were encouraged to plant all possible land in support of the war effort. In the United States, federal programs administered through local Soil and Water Conservation Districts provide technical assistance and partial funding to farmers who wish to implement management practices to conserve soil and limit erosion and floods.
|Millions of Tonnes in||2003||2013|
|Cow's milk, whole, fresh||77.0||91.0|
The only other crops to ever appear in the top 20 in the last 40 years were, commonly: tobacco, barley, and oats, and, rarely: peanuts, almonds, and sunflower seeds. Alfalfa and hay would both be in the top ten in 2003 if they were tracked by FAO.
|Major Crops in the U.S.||1997
(in US$ billions)
(in US$ billions)
|Source||1997 USDA – NASS reports, ||2015 USDA-NASS reports, |
Note alfalfa and hay are not tracked by the FAO and the production of tobacco in the United States has fallen 60% between 1997 and 2003.
Heavily mechanized, U.S. agriculture has a high yield relative to other countries. As of 2004: 
- Corn for grain, average of 160.4 bushels harvested per acre (10.07 t/ha)
- Soybean for beans, average of 42.5 bushels harvested per acre (2.86 t/ha)
- Wheat, average of 43.2 bushels harvested per acre (2.91 t/ha, was 44.2 bu/ac or 2.97 t/ha in 2003)
The major livestock industries in the United States:
|Cattle and calves||99,907,017||95,497,994||96,347,858||89,994,614|
|Hogs and pigs||61,188,149||60,405,103||67,786,318||66,026,785|
|Sheep and lambs||8,083,457||6,341,799||5,819,162||5,364,844|
& other meat chickens
Goats, horses, turkeys and bees are also raised, though in lesser quantities. Inventory data is not as readily available as for the major industries. For the three major goat-producing states—Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas—there were 1.2 million goats at the end of 2002. There were 5.3 million horses in the United States at the end of 1998. There were 2.5 million colonies of bees at the end of 2005.
- Cash grains includes corn, soybeans and other grains ( wheat, oats, barley, sorghum), dry edible beans, peas, and rice.
- Other field crops includes peanuts, potatoes, sunflowers, sweet potatoes, sugarcane, broomcorn, popcorn, sugar beets, mint, hops, seed crops, hay, silage, forage, etc. Tobacco and cotton can be included here if not in their own separate category.
- High-value crops includes fruits, vegetables, melons, tree nuts, greenhouse, nursery crops, and horticultural specialties.
- Poultry and eggs
Agriculture in the United States is primarily governed by periodically renewed U.S. farm bills. Governance is both a federal and a local responsibility with the United States Department of Agriculture being the federal department responsible. Government aid includes research into crop types and regional suitability as well as many kinds of subsidies, some price supports and loan programs. U.S. farmers are not subject to production quotas and some laws are different for farms compared to other workplaces.
Labor laws prohibiting children in other workplaces provide some exemptions for children working on farms with complete exemptions for children working on their family's farm. Children can also gain permits from vocational training schools or the 4-H club which allow them to do jobs they would otherwise not be permitted to do.
A large part of the U.S. farm workforce is made up of migrant and seasonal workers, many of them recent immigrants from Latin America. Additional laws apply to these workers and their housing which is often provided by the farmer.
In 2012, there were 3.2 million farmers,  ranchers and other agricultural managers and an estimated 757,900 agricultural workers were legally employed in the US. Animal breeders accounted for 11,500 of those workers with the rest categorized as miscellaneous agricultural workers. The median pay was $9.12 per hour or $18,970 per year.  In 2009, about 519,000 people under age 20 worked on farms owned by their family. In addition to the youth who lived on family farms, an additional 230,000 youth were employed in agriculture.  In 2004, women made up approximately 24% of farmers; that year, there were 580,000 women employed in agriculture, forestry, and fishing. 
From 1999–2009, roughly 50% of hired crop farmworkers in the U.S. were noncitizens working without legal authorization.  Large farms rely on new immigrants (such as Chinese, Japanese, Indian, Pakistani, and Mexican) that do not have many other options to work for extremely low wages. The legal status of the worker has been shown to impact the wage received for a job. An agricultural worker with no documentation earns an average of 15% less than one with amnesty or green card.  Moreover, it has been found that undocumented workers have decreased mobility in the agricultural industry because they are less able to have high-skill and high-earning jobs (jobs that are similar to their documented counterparts).  These first generation immigrants may remain as farm laborers seasonally for ten years. As they age, they grow poorer due to less skills, resources, and education.  The United States passed a special provision in 1986 called the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) under which the Special Agricultural Worker (SAW) program granted amnesty to some agricultural laborers because of the importance of these workers to the industry. Though this slightly improved the lives of some workers, many more live in poverty and without benefits today. For example, though these workers face many occupational hazards, they are not insured nor protected by government provisions such as the Affordable Care Act. Instead, SAWs rely on Community and Migrant Health Centers that are built to serve this population (though these also suffer from lack of funding and healthcare workers). 
Agriculture ranks among the most hazardous industries due to the use of chemicals and risk of injury.   Farmers are at high risk for fatal and nonfatal injuries (general traumatic injury and musculoskeletal injury), work-related lung diseases, noise-induced hearing loss, skin diseases, chemical-related illnesses, and certain cancers associated with chemical use and prolonged sun exposure.    In an average year, 516 workers die doing farm work in the U.S. (1992–2005). Every day, about 243 agricultural workers suffer lost-work-time injuries, and about 5% of these result in permanent impairment.  Tractor overturns are the leading cause of agriculture-related fatal injuries, and account for over 90 deaths every year. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends the use of roll over protection structures on tractors to reduce the risk of overturn-related fatal injuries. 
Farming is one of the few industries in which families (who often share the work and live on the premises) are also at risk for injuries, illness, and death. Agriculture is the most dangerous industry for young workers, accounting for 42% of all work-related fatalities of young workers in the U.S. between 1992 and 2000. In 2011, 108 youth, less than 20 years of age, died from farm-related injuries.  Unlike other industries, half the young victims in agriculture were under age 15.  For young agricultural workers aged 15–17, the risk of fatal injury is four times the risk for young workers in other workplaces  Agricultural work exposes young workers to safety hazards such as machinery, confined spaces, work at elevations, and work around livestock. The most common causes of fatal farm-related youth injuries involve machinery, motor vehicles, or drowning. Together these three causes comprise more than half of all fatal injuries to youth on U.S. farms.  Women in agriculture (including the related industries of forestry and fishing) numbered 556,000 in 2011. 
Agriculture in the U.S. makes up approximately 75% of the country's pesticide use. Agricultural workers are at high risk for being exposed to dangerous levels of pesticides, whether or not they are directly working with the chemicals. 
Some U.S. research centers are focused on the topic of health and safety in agricultural practices. These centers not only conduct research on the subject of occupational disease and injury prevention, but also promote agricultural health and safety through educational outreach programs. Most of these groups are funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the US Department of Agriculture, or other state agencies.  Centers include:
- Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 
- Great Plains Center for Agricultural Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 
- High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 
- National Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, Marshfield, WI 
- Northeast Center for Agricultural and Occupational Health, New York Center for Agricultural Medicine and Health, Cooperstown, NY 
- Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 
- Southeast Center for Agricultural Health and Injury Prevention, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 
- Southwest Center for Agricultural Health, Injury Prevention and Education, University of Texas, Tyler, TX 
- Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center, a collaboration between the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, St. Paul, MN, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN and the National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield, WI with Migrant Clinicians Network, Salisbury, MD 
- Western Center for Agricultural Health and Safety, University of California, Davis, CA 
Women who work in agriculture face different occupational hazards than men. Women in agriculture are poisoned by pesticides at twice the rate of their male counterparts. Exposure to pesticides can also affect fertility; women exposed to pesticides take longer to conceive (men are unaffected). Women are also at risk for bronchitis from exposure to grain, pesticides, and dust. 
In many developing countries worldwide, women make up a significant proportion of agricultural workers, accounting for between 44–75% of agricultural workers, depending on which country is being examined.  In developed countries, approximately 36% of the entire agricultural workforce are women, with approximately one in five agricultural workers in the United States being women.  Women agricultural workers in the United States are exposed to various categories of pesticides, which include insecticides, fungicides, disinfectants, herbicides, and fumigants. These pesticides are applied in order to protect a multitude of crops, including but not limited to, fruits, vegetables, grains, and fiber crops.  The exposures can occur via application as well as residues left in the soil and on the crops after application has occurred; pesticide may also be present in ambient air.  Women may acquire acute pesticide poisoning, which has classified as being based on three criteria. These criteria include the strength of evidence that a pesticide exposure occurred, whether adverse health effects were observed by a healthcare professional, and if there is sufficient evidence that the known toxicology of the agent was consistent with the observed health effects.  The WHO defines acute pesticide poisoning as any illness or health effect resulting from suspected or confirmed exposure to a pesticide within 48 hours.  Female agricultural workers are less likely to wear Personal Protective Equipment, which is made of chemical resistance material that prevents chemicals from coming in contact with skin for a limited period of time,.   Only 51% of women pesticide handlers utilize PPE, while 26% of women non-handlers use PPE; this is significantly less than male workers in the agricultural field and is largely a result of ill-fitting equipment, including glasses, gloves, respirators, and protective outerwear.   
Surveillance for occupational pesticide-related illnesses and injuries are tracked by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through the SENSOR-Pesticides program.  The EPA estimates between 10,000–20,000 physician related pesticide poisonings are reported among hired US agricultural workers each year.  "While poisonings comprise a relatively small portion of total agricultural worker occupational illness, this is likely underestimated due to inadequate state surveillance programs, lack of physician training to recognize poisonings, lack of health insurance among farm workers, worker reluctance to report poisonings, and the transient nature of agricultural workers".  Female agricultural workers face the same potential acute exposure and chronic conditions as do their male counterparts.
Acute exposure conditions: dizziness; confusion; abnormal skin sensations; contact dermatitis; eye irritation; chest tightness; gastrointestinal problems; vomiting; convulsions; and even death in cases of acute exposure. 
Chronic conditions: dermatological sensitivity; respiratory disease including lung fibrosis and chronic bronchitis; asthma-like syndromes; cancer; and neurological symptoms. 
The issue of preconceptional prenatal exposure is another factor in the health of female agricultural workers. It has been documented in the literature that pesticide exposure before or during pregnancy has been associated with increased risk of infertility,  perinatal death,  spontaneous abortion/stillbirth,  premature birth,  and congenital malformations.  These health ramifications not only impact the physical and mental health of women but also future generations.
The female agricultural workers are not the only ones that suffer damage from pesticide exposure. Husbands of the agricultural worker as well as the children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren are also affected. This is due to exposure to organophosphorus pesticides because they have been shown to cause damage to DNA in sperm cells.  When DNA damage is done in gamete cells (sperm and egg cells) then the future generations will all be affected. The damage may not cause any noticeable abnormalities in the development of the child born to a father with sperm cell DNA damage. However, it could lead to such serious complications as autism (caused by chromosomal abnormalities) or leukemia.  Female agricultural workers that are exposed to pesticides can expose their family members by bringing home some of the pesticides from work on their clothes, or skin.  The husband's DNA can be compromised through this exposure pathway, as well as any other children already born and living in the house.
The two most common limitations in studying the health effects of pesticide exposure in women are the small sample sizes and the lack of toxicological data.   Ensuring that the proper exposure is measured relies heavily on the study participants not moving residences throughout the study period. However, this is nearly impossible because migrant workers and seasonal employees do not typically live in the same place throughout the year.  Scientific studies require consistency within the group of participants being studied so that confounders are adjusted for, and transient residents do not make for very consistent study participants. Such living arrangements also make agricultural workers difficult to get in contact with. The most common methods for scientific researchers to find a person's contact information are not available for these populations. Health insurance information is not available and contact information left with an employer may not be correct year-round.  Additionally, there is a very limited amount of quantifiable data on the pesticides the study participants are exposed to.  The specific names of the pesticides may not be available.  The units of pesticide applied per field may not accurately represent the units that a worker is exposed to.  The number of days or hours that an agricultural worker is exposed is rarely recorded. This is due to the inconsistencies in the end of an agricultural work day practices – such as removing work clothing before going home, showering before going home, etc. Additionally, the proximity of agricultural workers' homes to the fields they harvest results in more exposure to the pesticides, and the amount of exposure at home is even more difficult to measure.
In addition to the scientific limitations regarding pesticide exposure data, a variety of challenges exist in the industry for female farmworkers. Occupational safety measures are not always well defined and rarely enforced. This means that not all laborers are subject to safety training through their provider. Furthermore, as many as 35% of female farmworkers do not know of any health risks associated with pesticide spraying at all.  When workers are unaware of best practices in pesticide application and the subsequent health risks, they are unable to protect themselves and their families appropriately from pesticide exposure. One of the first steps of protection against exposure is through personal protective equipment (PPEs). However, PPEs are not regularly used and rarely includes all the recommended protective measures such as goggles and gloves.  Some women also report not having the necessary equipment to mix the pesticides and ultimately resort to using household items like broomsticks or even their hands. 
Home safety provides its own challenges for women. It is possible for non-laborers to be exposed to pesticides through clothing contamination. In order to maintain a safe home environment, clothing from spraying pesticides should be cleaned and stored separately from other clothing in the household.  Exposure can also be limited by having workers shower within 15 minutes of returning home at the end of the work day.  The pesticides used in the agricultural industry in the United States often have a strong odor that helps to remind families of the presence of toxins which makes it more likely that they PPEs and equipment will be stored appropriately.  Family members are also subject to contamination through food and water supplies.  Many people reported reusing pesticide containers for laundry or to carry water. 
Finally, all of these factors are compounded by social determinants affecting agricultural workers. Studies have shown that as many as 97% of female farm laborers take their children with them to work, thereby directly exposing them to pesticide contamination.  Farm workers have literacy rates significantly lower than the rest of the population. This negatively impacts health outcomes because employees that have not received safety training are not able to read the warning labels and instructions on the pesticides. In one study, "Only 85 (23.2%) of the women could read English and 69 (18.9%) reported ever reading the pesticide labels.".  Housing is usually cramped without adequate laundry or bathroom facilities to wash and store equipment.  Such dwellings are often occupied by multiple laborers thereby multiplying the overall contaminants. Lastly, women in the agricultural industry report accessing prenatal health care services at nearly half the rate of the national average, 42% vs. 76%, respectively. 
Female farm workers may often face social challenges and adverse mental health effects while working, with one of the biggest challenges being social inequality. The number of women working in agriculture has risen and the 2002 census of agriculture recorded a 40% increase in the number of female farm workers.  Inequality and respect are common issues for these workers, as many have reported that they are not being respected, listened to, or taken seriously due to traditional views of women as housewives and caretakers. 
Women may also face resistance when attempting to advance to higher positions. Other issues reported by female farm workers include receiving less pay than their male counterparts and a refusal or reluctance by their employers to offer their female workers the same additional benefits given to male workers such as housing.  This inequality in pay can cause some women to seek off-farm jobs, which can be difficult if the women are older or have no education or related experience.  The risk of injury for farm workers is high. Studies have shown that safety recautions and regulations tend to focus on the male's work because of the traditional idea that the male farm workers work is more dangerous and risky than the females, despite women also engaging in equally risky work such as caring for farm animals or using farming machinery. 
Women in the farming industry are more likely than men to experience depression and women who experience higher rates of depression are more likely to have been through traumatic events such as sexual abuse and stress due to gender inequality.  They are also at a disadvantage when beginning farm work due to some female workers lacking knowledge about the chemical hazards on farms, which can pose issues for pregnant farm workers who are exposed to chemicals that can harm the pregnancy.  Some farm workers may also be immigrants who may not be educated on the importance of prenatal care, especially when being exposed to harmful chemicals, which can cause them to experience complications during pregnancy and have children born with birth defects.  
Protection of women's reproductive health is needed for female agricultural workers. Farm work is one of three most dangerous occupations in the United States.  According to the National Agricultural Workers Survey (1994–1995), the proportion of women in farming declined from 25% in the 1980s to less than 20% in the 1990s.  As a result of "a larger portion of the farm worker population being U.S. born (1994–1995) which means that every third U.S. born farm worker was a woman while only one in eight foreign-born farm workers was a woman. " Due to their occupation, women and their families are at risk to higher exposure from pesticides than the general population from direct contact and pesticide drift as result of their housing proximity to agricultural lands.  To ensure the safety and health of women, they need additional surveillance and monitoring for any toxic effects caused by working and living in close proximity to commercial spraying operations,.   Moreover, this is important to women's reproductive health,   because the quality of healthcare they receive in the United States during their lifespan has a direct impact on their reproductive health and well-being and that of their US-born children,.   Furthermore, "U.S. born workers, women tended to be older than their male counterparts (32 and 25 years old, respectively) while among the foreign-born farm workers, there was no meaningful difference in age between men and women (29 and 30 years old, respectively). " The key issues confronting women in agriculture's healthcare are: access to health care;  lack of affordable health insurance;  and lack of a medical home due to the seasonality of the work which forces migrant workers to follow the crops.
Increased enforcement and compliance of existing EPA's Worker Protection Standards  is needed to protect women workers from pesticide exposures as well as new policies that specifically address women's reproductive health and to their families and unborn children.  This is complicated due to the composition of the workforce which consists primarily of migrants with a mixed immigrant status and the United States government's policies  about not providing nonemergency health care to nonresidents. This includes prenatal care  for undocumented workers whose child born in the United States is considered an American by the 14 Amendment of the US Constitution or the Citizenship Clause. Additional work on compliance onsite by OSHA. 
- 2010 United States tomato shortage
- Banana production in the United States
- Beekeeping in the United States
- Child nutrition programs
- Electrical energy efficiency on United States farms
- Fishing industry in the United States
- Genetic engineering in the United States
- History of agriculture in the United States
- Poultry farming in the United States
- Soil in the United States
- List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities
- List of turkey meat producing companies in the United States
- Winterbottom, Jo; Huffstutter, P. J. (Feb. 2015). Rent walkouts point to strains in U.S. farm economy, Reuters
- "Latest U.S. Agricultural Trade Data." USDA Economic Research Service. Ed. Stephen MacDonald. USDA, 6 Sept. 2018.
- "US Census of Agriculture, 2007". Agcensus.usda.gov. 2009-02-04. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- Hatfield, J., 2012: Agriculture in the Midwest. In: U.S. National Climate Assessment Midwest Technical Input Report Archived 2013-06-21 at the Wayback Machine.. J. Winkler, J. Andresen, J. Hatfield, D. Bidwell, and D. Brown, coordinators. Available from the Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments (GLISA) Center
- Cronon, William. Changes in the Land : Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill & Wang, 2003.
- Shurtleff, William; Aoyagi, Akiko (2004). History of World Soybean Production and Trade – Part 1. Soyfoods Center, Lafayette, California: Unpublished Manuscript, History of Soybeans and Soyfoods, 1100 B.C. to the 1980s.
- "FAOSTAT". faostat3.fao.org. Retrieved 2015-11-26.
- "United States Crop Rankings – 1997 Production Year". Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- "Crop Values - 2014 Summary" (PDF). Retrieved 2015-11-26.
- "Chapter IX: Farm Resources, Income, and Expenses" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-04-09. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- USDA. 2004. 2002 Census of agriculture. United States summary and state data. Vol. 1. Geographic area series. Part 51. AC-02-A-51. 663 pp.
- USDA. 2009. 2007 Census of agriculture. United States summary and state data. Vol. 1. Geographic area series. Part 51. AC-07-A-51. 739 pp.
- USDA. 2014. 2012 Census of agriculture. United States summary and state data. Vol. 1. Geographic area series. Part 51. AC-12-A-51. 695 pp.
- "Appendix A: Glossary" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 18, 2009. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- "ERS/USDA Briefing Room – Farm Structure: Questions and Answers". Archived from the original on February 9, 2008. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- "Chapter 3: American Farms" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-24. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- , Retrieved May 6, 2016
- "Employment by major industry sector". Bls.gov. 2013-12-19. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- "Extension". Csrees.usda.gov. 2014-03-28. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- "Farm Demographics – U.S. Farmers by Gender, Age, Race, Ethnicity, and More".
- "Agricultural Workers: Occupational Outlook Handbook: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics". Bls.gov. 2014-01-08. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- Youth in Agriculture, OHSA, accessed January 21, 2014
- "Women's Safety and Health Issues at Work Job Area: Agriculture". NIOSH. September 27, 2013.
- "Farm Labor – Background". USDA Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 26 November 2016.
- Isé, Sabrina; Perloff, Jeffrey M. (1995-05-01). "Legal Status and Earnings of Agricultural Workers". American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 77 (2): 375–386. doi: 10.2307/1243547. ISSN 0002-9092. JSTOR 1243547.
- Taylor, J. Edward (1992-11-01). "Earnings and Mobility of Legal and Illegal Immigrant Workers in Agriculture". American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 74 (4): 889–896. doi: 10.2307/1243186. ISSN 0002-9092. JSTOR 1243186.
- Martin, Phillip (2002). "Mexican Workers and U.S. Agriculture: The Revolving Door". The International Migration Review.
- "Health care access and health care workforce for immigrant workers in the agriculture, forestry, and fisheries sector in the southeastern US". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 26 March 2013.
- "NIOSH- Agriculture". United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Archived from the original on 9 October 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
- Swanson, Naomi; Tisdale-Pardi, Julie; MacDonald, Leslie; Tiesman, Hope M. (13 May 2013). "Women's Health at Work". National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
- "NIOSH Pesticide Poisoning MOnitoring Program Protects Farmworkers". Cdc.gov. 2009-07-31. doi: 10.26616/NIOSHPUB2012108. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- Calvert, Geoffrey M.; Karnik, Jennifer; Mehler, Louise; Beckman, John; Morrissey, Barbara; Sievert, Jennifer; Barrett, Rosanna; Lackovic, Michelle; Mabee, Laura (Dec 2008). "Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the United States, 1998–2005". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 51 (12): 883–898. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20623. ISSN 1097-0274. PMID 18666136.
- "NIOSH- Agriculture Injury". United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Archived from the original on 28 October 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
- NIOSH . Unpublished analyses of the 1992–2000 Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Special Research Files provided to NIOSH by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (includes more detailed data than the research file, but excludes data from New York City). Morgantown, WV: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, Surveillance and Field Investigations Branch, Special Studies Section. Unpublished database.
- BLS . Report on the youth labor force. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, pp. 58–67.
- "Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks Demonstrate Effectiveness". Cdc.gov. 2009-07-31. doi: 10.26616/NIOSHPUB2011129. Retrieved 2014-04-01.
- "NIOSH Grants and Funding – Extramural Research and Training Programs – Training and Research – Agricultural Centers". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-03-03.
- "Home | CS-CASH | University of Nebraska Medical Center". www.unmc.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
- "Great Plains Center for Agricultural Health | Protecting and improve the health and safety of agricultural workers". www.public-health.uiowa.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
- "High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health & Safety". csu-cvmbs.colostate.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
- "National Children's Center for Rural Agricultural Health & Safety". Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation. 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-03-03.
- "Northeast Center for Occupational Safety and Health in Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing".
- "Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center". deohs.washington.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
- "Southeast Center for Agricultural Health and Injury Prevention | University of Kentucky College of Public Health". www.uky.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
- Day, Steven. "Southwest Center for Agricultural Health, Injury Prevention, and Education: Main". www.swagcenter.org. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
- "Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center – UMASH". Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health. University of Minnesota. 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-03-03.
- Sciences, Department of Public Health. "Western Center for Agricultural Health and Safety". agcenter.ucdavis.edu. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
- Garcia, A.M. (1999). "Parental agricultural work and selected congenital malformations". American Journal of Epidemiology. 149 (64).
- Calvert, G.M.; Karnik, J.; Mehler, L. (2008). "Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the United States". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 51 (12): 883–898. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20623. PMID 18666136.
- Calvert, G.M.; Karnik, J. (2008). "Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the United States". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 51 (12): 883–898. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20623. PMID 18666136.
- Thundiyil, J.G.; Stober, J.; Besbelli, N.; Pronczuk, J. "Acute pesticide poisoning: a proposed classification tool". World Health Organization.
- Calvert, G.M.; Karnik, J. (2008). "Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the United States, 1998–2005". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 51 (12): 883–898. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20623. PMID 18666136.
- Young, P. "Pesticide use and your personal protective equipment (PPE)" (PDF). Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Division.
- Calvert, G.M.; Karnik, J. (2008). "Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the United States, 1998–2005". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 51 (12): 883–898. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20623. PMID 18666136.
- Walker, J.L. "PPE for women: we've come a long way, 'rosie', but we still have a long ways to go" (PDF). International Safety Equipment Association.
- Acute Pesticide Poisoning Case Definition Matrix
- "National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2016) Pesticides illness and injury surveillance". Retrieved 17 March 2016.
- Das, R; Steege, A; Beckman, J; Harrison, R (2001). "Pesticide-related illness among migrant farm workers in the United States". Int J Occup Environ Health. 7 (4): 303–312. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2001.7.4.303.
- Costa, L.G.; Giordano, G; Guizzetti, M; Vitalone, A (2008). "Neurotoxicity of pesticides: a brief review". Front Biosci. 13 (13): 1240–1249. doi: 10.2741/2758.
- Quandt, S.A. (2013). "Occupational Health Outcomes for Workers in the Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing Sector: Implications for Immigrant Workers in the Southeastern US". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 56 (8): 940–959. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22170. PMID 23450720.
- Greenlee, A.R.; Arbuckle, T.E.; Chyou, P.H. (2003). "Risk Factors for Female Infertility in an Agricultural Region". Epidemiology. 14 (4): 429–436. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000071407.15670.aa.
- Bell, EM (2001). "A case-control study of pesticides and fetal death due to congenital anomalies". Epidemiology. 12 (2): 148. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200103000-00005.
- Nurminen, T (1995). "Maternal pesticide exposure and pregnancy outcome". J Occup Environ Med. 37 (8): 935. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199508000-00008.
- Eskenazi, B (2004). "Association of in utero organophosphate pesticide exposure and fetal growth and length of gestation in an agricultural population". Environmental Health Perspectives. 112 (10): 1116–1124. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6789. PMC 1247387. PMID 15238287.
- Garcia, AM (1999). "Parental agricultural work and selected congenital malformations". American Journal of Epidemiology. 149: 64. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009729.
- Sanchez-Pena, L.C.; Reyes, B.E.; Lopez-Carrillo, L.; Recio, R.; Moran-Martinez, J (2004). "Organophosphorous pesticide exposure alters sperm chromatin structure in Mexican agricultural workers". Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 196 (1): 108–113. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.023. PMID 15050412.
- Ward, M.H.; Colt, J.S.; Metayer, C.; Gunier, R.B. (2009). "Residential exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides and risk of childhood leukemia". Environmental Health Perspectives. 117 (6): 1007–13. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900583. PMC 2702395. PMID 19590698.
- El-Baz, M.A.; El-Deek, S.E.; Nsar, A.Y. (2015). "Prenatal Pesticide Exposure: Meconium as a Biomarker and Impact on Fetal Weight". Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology.
- Calvert, G.M.; Karnik, J.; Mehler, L.; Mitchell, Y. (2008). "Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the United States, 1998–2005". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 51 (12): 883–898. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20623. PMID 18666136.
- Ward, M.H.; Colt, J.S.; Metayer, C. (2009). "Residential exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides and risk of childhood leukemia". Environmental Health Perspectives. 117 (6): 1007. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900583. PMC 2702395. PMID 19590698.
- Habib, R.R.; Fathallah, F.A. (2012). "Migrant women farm workers in the occupational health literature". Work. 41 (1): 4356–4362.
- Calvert, G.M.; Karnik, J.; Mitchell, Y. (2008). "Acute pesticide poisoning among agricultural workers in the United States, 1998–2005". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 51 (12): 883–898. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20623. PMID 18666136.
- Andersen, H.R.; Grandjean, P. (2015). "Occupational pesticide exposure in early pregnancy associated with sex-specific neurobehavioral deficits in the children at school age". Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 47: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.10.006. PMID 25450661.
- Shelton, J.F.; Geraghty, E.M.; Hertz-Picciotto, I. (2014). "Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study". Environmental Health Perspectives (Online). 122 (10): 1103.
- Garcia, Ana M. (2003). "Pesticide Exposure and Women's Health". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 44 (6): 584–594. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10256. PMID 14635235.
- Naidoo, S.; et. al. (2010). "Pesticide Safety Training and Practices in Women Working in Small-Scale Agriculture in South Africa". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 67 (12): 823–828. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.055863. hdl: 1874/204725. PMID 20576924.
- Rao, Pamela; et. al. (2006). "Pesticide Safety Behaviors in Latino Farmworker Family Households". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 49 (4): 271–280. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20277. PMID 16550565.
- National Center for Farmworker Health, Inc. (2009). "Maternal and Child Health Fact Sheet": 1–5.
- Albright, Carmen (2006). "Who's Running The Farm?: Changes and characteristics of Arkansas women in Agriculture". American Agricultural Economics Association: 1315–1322 – via JSTOR.
- Jones, L. (2015). "North Carolina's Farm Women: Plowing around Obstacles". University of Georgia Press. – via JSTOR.
- Golichenko, M.; Sarang, A. (2013). "Farm labor, reproductive justice: Migrant women farmworkers in the US". Health and Human Rights – via JSTOR.
- Dimich-Ward, H., Guernsey, J., Pickett, W., Rennie, D., Hartling, L., & Brison, R. (2004). Gender Differences in the Occurrence of Farm Related Injuries. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(1), 52–56. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27732153
- Pulgar, C.A., Trejo, G., Suerken, C., Ip, E.H., Arcury, T.A., & Quandt, S.A. (2016). "Economic hardship and depression among women in latino farmworker families". Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 18(3), 497–504. doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxyhu.wrlc.org/10.1007/s10903-015-0229-6
- Larson, K. (1993). "Migrant Farmworkers' Health Issues". In Defense of the Alien, 16, 100–106. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23140866
- Calvert, G., Walter A. Alarcon, Ann Chelminski, Mark S. Crowley, Rosanna Barrett, Correa, A., Evans, E. (2007). "Case Report: Three Farmworkers Who Gave Birth to Infants with Birth Defects Closely Grouped in Time and Place. Florida and North Carolina, 2004–2005". Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(5), 787–791. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4489029
- "United States Farmworker Factsheet". Student Action with Farmworkers.
- "National Agricultural Workers Survey (1994–1995)".
- "National Agricultural Workers Survey (1994–1995)".
- "WPS Standards". 2014-09-18.
- "The Hastings Center: Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: U.S. Health Policy and Access to Care".
- "Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: Access to Prenatal Care".
- "Hidden Danger: Environmental Threats to Latino Community" (PDF). 2004.
- "Farm Labor, Reproductive Justice: Migrant Women Farmworkers in the US" (PDF).
- "Farmworker Justice: Pesticide Safety".
- "National Agricultural Workers Survey (1994–1995)".
- Shelton, Janie F.; Geraghty, Estella M.; Tancredi, Daniel J.; Delwiche, Lora D.; Schmidt, Rebecca J.; Ritz, Beate; Hansen, Robin L.; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva (2014). "Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Prenatal Residential Proximity to Agricultural Pesticides: The CHARGE Study". Environmental Health Perspectives. 122 (10): 1103–1109. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307044. PMC 4181917. PMID 24954055.
- "Women living near pesticide-treated fields have smaller babies".
- "Acute Pesticide Poisoning Among Agricultural Workers in the United States, 1998–2005" (PDF).
- Sanchez-Pena, L.C.; Reyes, B.E.; Lopez-Carillo, L. (2004). "Organophosphorous pesticide exposure alters sperm chromatin structure in Mexican agricultural workers". Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 196 (1): 108–113. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.023. PMID 15050412.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Agriculture in the United States.|